Gervonta ....Allegedly Struck Woman In Face

[Mindgames]

Again. We must wait for all of the facts to come out before we judge.

Besides...... We have no idea what the skank said or did to warrant such a supposed act by Davis.

So what in your mind justifies grabbing a woman by the neck and dragging her out of event she's at, just so we're clear?

[Robbie Barrett]

I didn't post that, did I? I notice you didn't take me up on the ban bet.

My argument is once you've been arrested you are innocent until proven guilty. I don't see how there is any debate on this point.

What? People that haven't been arrested are innocent until proven guilty too. Being arrested is insignificant in guilt. Daggum completely exposed your argument for the ****** **** it is.

[HitmanTommy]

So what in your mind justifies grabbing a woman by the neck and dragging her out of event she's at, just so we're clear?

She probably gave him a STD.

If that's the case, he has every right to act the way he did.

[The Big Dunn]

This post here:


Indicates your motivation is to protect Tank from criticism in the court of public opinion.

Yes and no. I am fully aware he will get "convicted in the court of public opinion" so I am focusing on the legal aspect of it.

[daggum]

I didn't post that, did I? I notice you didn't take me up on the ban bet.

My argument is once you've been arrested you are innocent until proven guilty. I don't see how there is any debate on this point.

and no one disputed your straw man. we only ask why you continue to bring that up when there is video of the incident showing what happened and you saying "ill let them decide for me" you cant make up your own mind? you are that blinded by allegiance?

[Mindgames]

I never posted anything like that. You are assuming that because you can't effectively argue against my point that Tank is innocent until proven guilty. YI am biased in favor of the American rule of law.

Theres the law, which isn't always right, but theres also the evidence of your own eyes, common sense
We all saw what happened, regardless of the justification, and people trying to negate it on a technicality. Just wondering, if you know the law, what counts as justification for dragging a woman along by her throat. Is there any way, outside of S&M, that its not assault?

[The Big Dunn]

What? People that haven't been arrested are innocent until proven guilty too. Being arrested is insignificant in guilt. Daggum completely exposed your argument for the ****** **** it is.

He did no such thing. His columbine argument was dumb as hell because at no point did I post or imply that if you weren't arrested you were innocent. That was just some dumb shit he tried to pretend he thought I was saying because he, nor you, have any real leg to stand on because Tank is innocent until proven guilty.

[famicommander]

Yes and no. I am fully aware he will get "convicted in the court of public opinion" so I am focusing on the legal aspect of it.

Why?

Are you his attorney?

Does it hurt you for people to see a video of him mistreating a woman, and then hear about a video of him hitting her, and then call him out for it?

Truly, truly bizarre.

[Mindgames]

She probably gave him a STD.

If that's the case, he has every right to act the way he did.

Really, is that a legal perspective? Protect yourself at all times no? Come on man, i know theres some evil women, but you really looking to justify this?

[Robbie Barrett]

He did no such thing. His columbine argument was dumb as hell because at no point did I post or imply that if you weren't arrested you were innocent. That was just some dumb shit he tried to pretend he thought I was saying because he, nor you, have any real leg to stand on because Tank is innocent until proven guilty.

Did you honestly not get what he did?


You said Davis is innocent unless convicted in court.

The columbine killers weren't convicted in court, so by your logic they're innocent.