Anti-Doping Rules Make Things Worst for Boxers

[Dosumpthin]

wow what jibberish. first off i have no idea where you got your numbers but you are clearly wrong about the 100k. it was 150k and it was paid up front. giant hit to your credibility.


usada cost no where near 150k during that time period. look at some stats, the usual usada testing fee was 15-35k. not 150k. trying to conflate how much vada costs with how much usada costs is completely irrelevant. your own conflation argument makes no sense because in it you say vada costs more yet that proves that floyd overpaid usada since usada costs less! so even using your silly argument you made no sense. for example you said vada charges 50k for 21 tests and usada did 22 for floyd-pac...yet the very next line you said vada charges more so you own goaled yourself there proving the 150k was not needed and was a gross overpayment(bribe).

50k of the 150k is held as a legal retainer.

That leaves 100k.

You seem to be in disbelief. I get it. You were lied to by those you trust.

Don't be so gullible next time.

50k for 21 test of 50k for 22 test - which is more?


AND WHY IS IT OK FOR VADA TO CHARGE 50k PER FIGHTER? LMAO

[Dosumpthin]

15-35k? Nonsense. They send multiple agents out to collect samples, they have to pay the labs etc. You think they do 22 tests for 15k?

Apparently it's normal if one fighter ducks the biggest fight of all time over random drug testing - yeah charge normal rates and perform basic testing. A billion dollars generated but we can save on testing!


What a ****** pact!rd

[Dariusz]

Only the most radical measures can work -- I can think of some as e.g. a fighter who was caught dirty cannot be taken into account i (after the ban period) in any title battles no matter how good is his resume or even such a person is banned for life from any events.
This would rather take off the willingness to try to be better with doping.

[KingHippo]

Over 3k post and zero rep power. Ya i think its safe to say this forum isnt for you

That sounds like something a dirty insider would say

[KingHippo]

Only the most radical measures can work -- I can think of some as e.g. a fighter who was caught dirty cannot be taken into account i (after the ban period) in any title battles no matter how good is his resume or even such a person is banned for life from any events.
This would rather take off the willingness to try to be better with doping.

Only makes things worst for the little man. Money cows get to avoid sanctions while no names get taken out. Makes it easy to wipe out threats through sabotage too.

[lolasif]

We need more testing, not less. Just take Jarrell Miller as an example. He has been using PEDs for most of his career, made millions, and almost got a World title shot out of it, because he wasn't being tested.

Now he's "served" a self-imposed ban, and will make millions more, while still doping, and get away with it until he cheats his way to another title fight against someone with the leverage to demand adequate testing.

[MulaKO]

This reminds me of the famous war against drugs

Now , tell me , who the Fugh is winning that war

[Dariusz]

Only makes things worst for the little man. Money cows get to avoid sanctions while no names get taken out. Makes it easy to wipe out threats through sabotage too.

You are right.