Comments Thread For: Joshua: For Legacy and History, The Wilder Fight Will Definitely Happen

[CaptainWalrus]

Lock it in! 2043 in a nursing home.

[Vinnykin]

Talking like Feb 22nd is a foregone conclusion..... Fury is and still will be the man to beat after that date.

[Corelone]

The low IQ crew are exposing themselves big time in this thread.

I'm not the one making up bull****.

[kafkod]

I'm not the one making up bull****.

What bull**** am I making up?

I said Dillian passed all his VADA tests.

Is that true or not?

[Corelone]

What bull**** am I making up?

I said Dillian passed all his VADA tests.

Is that true or not?

You said Whyte was 100% clean. I see you like playing with words. 100% but not by UKAD, so Whyte is not clean. Unless UKAD is bull****ting.

[HowSwayhow]

Weird this thread turned into Whyte is dirty thread considering Joshua seems to be blowing smoke up peoples asses about getting an unified some time this year... It is a joke in itself lol

But to comment, if Whyte is dirty or otherwise I feel all his posturing is for a fight he delusional that he can win. He doesn't fight to a strength he can use against Wilder so when he gets his chin checked clean, he is out, being if he is dirty or not.

On the topic at hand. We all know it was going to be a trilogy deal with Fury v. Wilder. After losing and regaining the belts now Joshua need to "recover" much more. And being the unified champ can "clear" that lost he got from Ruiz. Joshua isn't a champion for nothing so fighting to go up is waaayyy better than sitting pretty on mandas that could cost him his legacy.

To be fair, i am a boxing fan also i like what Wilder, Fury and Joshua is doing for heavyweight boxing. The drama can backfire if not tempered right. People are picking sides drawing lines in the sand but at fight night, if the fight was entertaining I cannot be too upset at the result, unless i am a betting man. Just be patience everybody, i still think all the fights you are looking for will happen... Just root for the right reasons or just shut the hell up about it.

[kafkod]

You said Whyte was 100% clean. I see you like playing with words. 100% but not by UKAD, so Whyte is not clean. Unless UKAD is bull****ting.

I said Whyte's VADA tests came back 100% clean.

Is that true or not?

[Corelone]

I said Whyte's VADA tests came back 100% clean.

Is that true or not?

And I never said he cheated, just he wasnt 100% clean. UKAD called it accidental, the BBBofB is still waiting for the B sample, VADA is clearing him, but 100% is a broad statement about a small portion of the situation.

[kafkod]

And I never said he cheated, just he wasnt 100% clean. UKAD called it accidental, the BBBofB is still waiting for the B sample, VADA is clearing him, but 100% is a broad statement about a small portion of the situation.

I said his VADA tests came back 100% clean.

What part of that comment is a lie?

[Jkp]

He tested positive. The VADA tests were used as evidence to show it was contamination because he passed them. Whyte tested positive because of UKAD testing. If the UK had the same testing as the US he would not have. So makes zero sense to ridicule it. UK testing is superior to US. That's just fact.

Not superior, they just got lucky and timed there test better and whyte stuffed something up and got caught out.