Which governing body has the best/worst reputation?

[Wurider]

I am referring to the big 4 WBA, WBC, IBF, and WBO? Is there anyone that has more prestige than the others, Which one has the worst reputation?

[QueensburyRules]

I am referring to the big 4 WBA, WBC, IBF, and WBO? Is there anyone that has more prestige than the others, Which one has the worst reputation?

- -U like choosing U stink?

[Marchegiano]

WBC in both regards

[pacphobia]

In terms of prestige:
#1 Lineal
#2 WBC
#3 WBA
#4 IBF
#5 RING
#6 WBO

[Eff Pandas]

This is a classic whos turd is the best looking contest. And as always the answer is they are all turds you dummy. There is no best turd.

[Mammoth]

This is a classic whos turd is the best looking contest. And as always the answer is they are all turds you dummy. There is no best turd.

[BoxingIsGreat]

All are equally crooked and useless.

[bulldognyc]

I’d say the WBA is the most ridiculous and should not be considered a belt anymore, despite it being the oldest one. The WBC ain’t far behind with the shyte they come up with. WBO obviously has it’s a deal with top rank and warren. The IBF enforces it’s mandatories but it’s rankings are god awful. I think the belts shouldn’t be the big picture. They’re all corrupt.

[boliodogs]

The WBC just do whatever they want and follow no rules but just make up rules for the situation. The WBA has too many champs in the same weight class. One of these two probably has the worst reputation. The WBC shows much favoritism toward Mexican boxers.

[Vinnykin]

Being a holder of a world title from any of these orgs means nothing nowadays.... it's all about fighting the best in the division, unifying and being onsensus #1 that is where prestige and legacy come in.