Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Floyd should fight Crawford

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Jedi Vader View Post
    Floyd schooled Pac and Canelo. He doesn't need to rematch them. I've explained this to you a million times.
    .
    Yes, I'm sure you've explained why you don't want to see Floyd rematch people a billion times.
    But even if you gave your explanation 2 billion times it don't mean it's acceptable to people. If a fight is controversial in anyway shape of form it needs a rematch. If there's controversy in your biggest wins, your entire resume is essentially a lie, and entire career is up for scrutiny
    Last edited by hugh grant; 01-25-2020, 05:02 AM.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by djtmal View Post
      its also a fact that he's unretired as much as he's announced retirements, who is going to put a lot of stock in that?

      and why should you care how much money is in it for him? you on the payroll or something?
      You're Extremely Naive, you still THINK that Mayweather gives a F#CK what you and I want

      I don't give a damn about Mayweather money but does he not make it known what he is about? Floyd "MONEY" Mayweather yet some how you THINK he will fight Crawford just because that is what you want?
      [IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/26tn8CFJvoFDlCXn2/*****.gif[/IMG]

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by sicko View Post
        You're Extremely Naive, you still THINK that Mayweather gives a F#CK what you and I want

        I don't give a damn about Mayweather money but does he not make it known what he is about? Floyd "MONEY" Mayweather yet some how you THINK he will fight Crawford just because that is what you want?
        [IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/26tn8CFJvoFDlCXn2/*****.gif[/IMG]

        No, because that’s who he should be boxing if he’s making a come back. Not some circus show against Mcgregor.
        Absolutely NOBODY is asking for Mcgregor Mayweather 2.

        Not even Mcgregor fans.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by sicko View Post
          You're Extremely Naive, you still THINK that Mayweather gives a F#CK what you and I want

          I don't give a damn about Mayweather money but does he not make it known what he is about? Floyd "MONEY" Mayweather yet some how you THINK he will fight Crawford just because that is what you want?
          [IMG]https://media3.*****.com/media/26tn8CFJvoFDlCXn2/*****.gif[/IMG]
          Ok. So when he is called a no risk, cherrypicking clown show, no rebuttal from you.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
            Yes, I'm sure you've explained why you don't want to see Floyd rematch people a billion times.
            But even if you gave your explanation 2 billion times it don't mean it's acceptable to people. If a fight is controversial in anyway shape of form it needs a rematch. If there's controversy in your biggest wins, your entire resume is essentially a lie, and entire career is up for scrutiny
            Floyd schooled Pac and Canelo. He doesn't need to rematch them. I've explained this to you a million times.

            Why are you still here? You said you wouldn't post on Pac and Floyd threads ever again if Floyd won FOTD.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Jedi Vader View Post
              Floyd schooled Pac and Canelo. He doesn't need to rematch them. I've explained this to you a million times.

              Why are you still here making me look like the Floyd fanboy I am?.
              Explain it again and give people a laugh why Floyd's biggest wins aren't controversial and why he don't rematch his biggest names foes when every other great boxer did 3 to 5 times to prove without shadow of doubt they were better. If srr can rematch Lamotta 5 times and Ali can rematch Frasier 3 times, why can't Floyd rematch great Fighters twice? Leave no stone unturned in showing it, as having 2 wins over a great fighter is better than 1 win. The first win could be down to luck, or Cws in floyds case
              Last edited by hugh grant; 01-25-2020, 05:51 PM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                Explain it again and give people a laugh why Floyd's biggest wins aren't controversial and why he don't rematch his biggest names foes when every other great boxer did 3 to 5 times to prove without shadow of doubt they were better. If srr can rematch Lamotta 5 times and Ali can rematch Frasier 3 times, why can't Floyd rematch great Fighters twice? Leave no stone unturned in showing it, as having 2 wins over a great fighter is better than 1 win. The first win could be down to luck, or Cws in floyds case
                Floyd schooled Pac and Canelo. He doesn't need to rematch them. I've explained this to you a million times.

                Why are you still here? You said you wouldn't post on Pac and Floyd threads ever again if Floyd won FOTD.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Jedi Vader View Post
                  Floyd schooled Pac and Canelo. He doesn't need to rematch them. I've explained this to you a million times.

                  Why are you still here? You said you wouldn't post on Pac and Floyd threads ever again if Floyd won FOTD.
                  How can you school a man that fought injured?

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
                    How can you school a man that fought injured?
                    What injury?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Floyd is beyond washed up. he don't gotta fight nobody. and a rematch with Conor will pay him way more than vs Crawford lol.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP