Me believing or not about Ortiz and Breazeale chance has nothing to do with Whyte NOT being mandatory "for a crazy amount of time" which is simply not correct. Why twist my post and change the subject?
Frankly, I have not been impressed with Whyte's performances or his discipline of being in shape. So, I am not a big fan of him or his fighting style (quite boring to be honest). Regarding his PED history, it ain't spotless either particularly with this being in the UK. But it is what it is, he has been cleared so let's move over it.
At current, I would like to see the Wilder vs Fury, Fury vs Joshua and Wilder vs Joshua rather than any of them fighting Whyte. Let him fight against Ruiz or Ortiz or Dubois and if he wins, against AJ or Fury or Wilder.
Whyte is mandatory for 1 month (or 6 if you think he shouldn't have been suspended). Prior to that, he simply refused to fight eliminators and wanted to be made mandatory anyway simply based on his ranking. I would have loved that eliminator match to have been against Ortiz rather than lower-ranked Rivas. It would have been competitive.
Frankly, I have not been impressed with Whyte's performances or his discipline of being in shape. So, I am not a big fan of him or his fighting style (quite boring to be honest). Regarding his PED history, it ain't spotless either particularly with this being in the UK. But it is what it is, he has been cleared so let's move over it.
At current, I would like to see the Wilder vs Fury, Fury vs Joshua and Wilder vs Joshua rather than any of them fighting Whyte. Let him fight against Ruiz or Ortiz or Dubois and if he wins, against AJ or Fury or Wilder.
Whyte is mandatory for 1 month (or 6 if you think he shouldn't have been suspended). Prior to that, he simply refused to fight eliminators and wanted to be made mandatory anyway simply based on his ranking. I would have loved that eliminator match to have been against Ortiz rather than lower-ranked Rivas. It would have been competitive.
Comment