Vince needs his own version of Andre the giant..his dad pumped the shhh out of Andre and built his brand internationally on the back of that man. That biography is nuts btw, Andre was a party legend..talking about downing a case of wine in the time it take to drive from one state to the next
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Fury: WWE Picked Me Over Wilder Because I'm Entertaining
Collapse
-
Fury is right. Wilder is less entertaining than a bad habit that won't go away.
"Most definitely. And lemme tell you people again how I'm the greatest fighter in history"
...After EVERY question he's asked in interviews...
or words to that effect.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Zelda View PostOr could it be because Wilder is a serious boxer while Fury is a clown?
WWE did not invite Joshua, or Whyte or Ortiz or Ruiz or Povetkin or Klitschko either.
Comment
-
-
Fury is a great technician AND a showman. Ali was as well and he fought Inoki.
Wilder has great power but I doubt he could do well in wrestling (I mean both show and movements).
Comment
-
I don't know what's more saddening...Fury with his WWE talk or guys like Robbie Barrett, kaftod, Punchy, and the other UK stans who come to this site to launch insults at the no grammar no boxing skill black guy who got rich as hell because he can punch really hard.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PunchyPotorff View PostExcept Fury is a much better boxer than Wilder. Wilder's timing is inadequate, he usually follows his opponent around the ring, and his footwork is embarrassing. Besides the 2 knockdowns... what makes you think Wilder accomplished much of anything vs Fury?
So, what are you ranting about?
Also, if you're looking for those "skills", it might come to you as a surprise that it is WWE (E for entertainment) for a reason...the whole thing is acting and it is scripted. Not "real fights" that will require your boxing skills.
Comment
Comment