Tweet
Well he did, he was asked by Eddie Hearn to show those terms and he couldnt, infact he stopped replying at that point. I see what you do now, You keep the biggest spin lies you hear and refuse to accept them as anything less than 100% fact. You are the biggest liar on this forum and im far from the 1st person to say that about you.
-
-
You're lying. Espinoza stated the contract said Sky got UK rights. Hearn said he was lying, so Espinoza posted a scan of the portion of the contract pertaining to UK rights to prove he was telling the truth and that Hearn was the liar.
Hearn then did was he always does and tried to get cute with his phrasing to try to fool UK fanboys. So Hearn said: "Show the contract you sent"
Hearn did this for two reasons. #1 - He knew the contract he was sent came from Wilder, not Espinoza, so Espinoza couldn't possibly show the contract he sent, since he's not the one who sent it. #2 - He knew it would be considered incredibly unprofessional by everybody in the industry to post a full contract, so there was no way Espinoza could fulfill Hearn's request without doing incredible damage to himself professionally. UK fanboys fell for Hearn's trick, just like they always do.
You're lying. Espinoza continued to reply.infact he stopped replying at that point.
Never said I sent it. Wilder sent it and you confirmed receipt.
"Hearn told ESPN that he had indeed received the offer by email from Wilder's personal account..."
Three detailed pages, not one paragraph.
Mischaracterize much? Never said "we" sent a contract. I said a contract was sent.
Again, never said "I" sent a contract. And I'm not going to expose private business arrangements in a Twitter discussion.
Considering your attempt to deny AJ's 6-fight Showtime deal after just 3 fights, it's not surprising that you wouldn't remember this one either.
So what do you call the 3-page document you received? An agreement? Deal proposal? Term sheet? It had all the relevant terms necessary to establish an agreement.
Remember you thought that the AJ multi-fight deal wasn't a contract either, and you were wrong about that too.
Didn't release anything that wasn't already public, other than you failed attempt to ignore the agreement you already entered into.
You didn't answer the question. A 3-page contract was sent. You said it wasn't. So what do you call the 3-page document that you received?
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...46972428767232
I know what was sent, as do you, since we both received copies.
You don't dispute that you received a 3-page document containing the deal terms. For the THIRD time, I'm asking you what you call that 3-page document you received, since you're claiming it's not a contract.
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...49791701590021
LOL...the lies continue. You're quite creative.
You don't dispute that you received a 3-page document with deal terms, but you don't consider it a contract...just like you didn't consider the AJ multi-fight deal a contract until you got legal advice telling you otherwise.
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...53602381893634
No issue with AJ.
Just reminding you of your consistent attempts to misrepresent facts and your apparent inability (or refusal) to recognize contractual obligations.
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...56854120968193
Wow. Pathological. What a colossal waste of time this has become.
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...59522293891073
Ran out of money after the AJ contract finished in March 2018? Another blatant lie. We did 9 more 2018 events after that. Quite a feat to do that with no money.Comment
-
Its very hypocritical of you to talk about people being bias towards AJ or Hearn, right before you go off on an anti-Joshua rant about his last two fights.
You only responded to the thread because you feel compelled to, as a Wilder fan. What do you get out of replying? Probably the same as the guy starting the thread.Comment
-
Directly quoting someone's Twitter feed and the truth are NOT the same thing.You're lying. Espinoza stated the contract said Sky got UK rights. Hearn said he was lying, so Espinoza posted a scan of the portion of the contract pertaining to UK rights to prove he was telling the truth and that Hearn was the liar.
Hearn then did was he always does and tried to get cute with his phrasing to try to fool UK fanboys. So Hearn said: "Show the contract you sent"
Hearn did this for two reasons. #1 - He knew the contract he was sent came from Wilder, not Espinoza, so Espinoza couldn't possibly show the contract he sent, since he's not the one who sent it. #2 - He knew it would be considered incredibly unprofessional by everybody in the industry to post a full contract, so there was no way Espinoza could fulfill Hearn's request without doing incredible damage to himself professionally. UK fanboys fell for Hearn's trick, just like they always do.
You're lying. Espinoza continued to reply.
Never said I sent it. Wilder sent it and you confirmed receipt.
"Hearn told ESPN that he had indeed received the offer by email from Wilder's personal account..."
Three detailed pages, not one paragraph.
Mischaracterize much? Never said "we" sent a contract. I said a contract was sent.
Again, never said "I" sent a contract. And I'm not going to expose private business arrangements in a Twitter discussion.
Considering your attempt to deny AJ's 6-fight Showtime deal after just 3 fights, it's not surprising that you wouldn't remember this one either.
So what do you call the 3-page document you received? An agreement? Deal proposal? Term sheet? It had all the relevant terms necessary to establish an agreement.
Remember you thought that the AJ multi-fight deal wasn't a contract either, and you were wrong about that too.
Didn't release anything that wasn't already public, other than you failed attempt to ignore the agreement you already entered into.
You didn't answer the question. A 3-page contract was sent. You said it wasn't. So what do you call the 3-page document that you received?
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...46972428767232
I know what was sent, as do you, since we both received copies.
You don't dispute that you received a 3-page document containing the deal terms. For the THIRD time, I'm asking you what you call that 3-page document you received, since you're claiming it's not a contract.
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...49791701590021
LOL...the lies continue. You're quite creative.
You don't dispute that you received a 3-page document with deal terms, but you don't consider it a contract...just like you didn't consider the AJ multi-fight deal a contract until you got legal advice telling you otherwise.
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...53602381893634
No issue with AJ.
Just reminding you of your consistent attempts to misrepresent facts and your apparent inability (or refusal) to recognize contractual obligations.
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...56854120968193
Wow. Pathological. What a colossal waste of time this has become.
https://twitter.com/StephenEspinoza/...59522293891073
Ran out of money after the AJ contract finished in March 2018? Another blatant lie. We did 9 more 2018 events after that. Quite a feat to do that with no money.
By doing so, you are saying that everything that everything posted on Twitter is categorically true.Comment
-
Nobody said they were. The troll I was responding to had claimed that Espinoza had stopped replying when Hearn asked him to post the contract he sent (to fool fans who didn't realize Espinoza wasn't the one who sent the contract). Directly quoting Espinoza's twitter feed shows that troll was lying about Espinoza not responding.
Nobody said that. Next time you should read what you're replying to.By doing so, you are saying that everything that everything posted on Twitter is categorically true.Comment
-
its aj fans that start these ****** threads daily trying to force these ****** narratives; so I respond the way I see fit, its a fact that aj got his azz whooped, and its a fact they are the #1 fan base starting these ****** threads and posting like wild maniacs all day, what did I say wrong?Comment
-
I think Josh is the one wilder fears most. Josh beat wlad, the man who downed him in sparring. Wilder believes in triangle theoriesComment
Comment