It's got to be pac if you want to give award credibility as he's got the longevity records. He's fought 23 years at the very least. 4 decade champ.
But I wouldn't dismiss Floyd out of sight now as he's set precedents of only needing to fight 6 years. Don't judge book by its cover
Why are you here? You said you would never post in a Floyd/Pac thread again if Floyd won FOTD. Yet here you are?
Why are you here? You said you would never post in a Floyd/Pac thread again if Floyd won FOTD. Yet here you are?
Floyd continues to ruin your life.
Thanks for your concern but you really shouldnt be asking this constantly. Ive answered but you seem to not have listened.
Ive got my mojo back, i will be posting. But not in the same way as before if your observant you will notice. I will be succint and if i feel ive got my point across i will not have a strong need to post too much in same thread, unless i got a new idea that will benefit the thread.
You can quote me on this and put it as your avatar or signature so you dont forget.
During this span both guys have surefire 1st ballot hof resumes. One guy has four losses and 2 draws during that time frame. The other guy is undefeated, including a win over the other guy which is without a doubt the best win either of them had over the 20 year span.
When historians and media members put together “best of” or “ATG” lists, one guy is always ahead of the other.
It is clear the answer is floyd, but this is nsb so we have to watch posters make absolute fools of themselves trying to rationally defend the illogical opinion it’s manny.
It’s sad to watch so many posters claim “ well it’s just my opinion” rather than just admit they are making a choice the facts don’t support for other reasons.
History never supports unbeaten fighters which is what you are putting forward as the case for floyd, which is odd to say the least. BH lost to JC and and lost 9 times, yet is greater than JC. THe fact that the boxers considered the greatest always have at least 10 losses on your their resumes, youd have thought guys like you wouldnt feel so insecure that youd need to mention FLoyds unbeaten record. Unbeaten records only make people su****ious, and not fawn like you want people to.
People could write essays on why floyd is unbeaten, ranging from being overly cautious, never fighting outside country, always trying to get advantages more often than not. And if you try getting advantags more than not, you are unlikely to lose, the odds of not losing are stacked heavily in your favour. Not giving the biggest names on his CV rematches when there is controversy in the fights. Floyd fans just say, floyd won convincingly according to judges as to why rematches werent necesary? Thats why you cant talk with floyd fans.
Plenty of boxing trainers and names in sport have said Pac is top 3 or the best. Only internet warriors like yourself claim floyd is above Pac.
History never supports unbeaten fighters which is what you are putting forward as the case for floyd, which is odd to say the least. BH lost to JC and and lost 9 times, yet is greater than JC. THe fact that the boxers considered the greatest always have at least 10 losses on your their resumes, youd have thought guys like you wouldnt feel so insecure that youd need to mention FLoyds unbeaten record. Unbeaten records only make people su****ious, and not fawn like you want people to.
People could write essays on why floyd is unbeaten, ranging from being overly cautious, never fighting outside country, always trying to get advantages more often than not. And if you try getting advantags more than not, you are unlikely to lose, the odds of not losing are stacked heavily in your favour. Not giving the biggest names on his CV rematches when there is controversy in the fights. Floyd fans just say, floyd won convincingly according to judges as to why rematches werent necesary? Thats why you cant talk with floyd fans.
Plenty of boxing trainers and names in sport have said Pac is top 3 or the best. Only internet warriors like yourself claim floyd is above Pac.
History has never had a ATG finish his carer as an unbeaten fighter with this amount of HOF'ers on their resume with his accomplishments. This isn't a Chavez type 72-0 where many of the guys are cab drivers and dishwashers. His undefeated record is a fact, that is why I mentioned it.
You can try your hardest to discredit his unbeaten record but you just look foolish. Floyd doesn't have losses to guys like Torrecampo and Horn. You just have to accept that fact and move on.
No one has claimed Manny is top 3. Every list has Floyd ahead of Manny, a fact you can't change.
This is real easy-put their resume's from Jan 1, 2000- dec 31, 2019 side by side. Use the same criteria for each. Floyd will come out ahead. Notice the guys that pick Manny always make up some ridiculous criteria or they just put Manny and never defend the choice as to why.
I thought you weren't going to post anymore? Just go away dude. There are plenty of places for disgruntled Manny fans to congregate and cry together.
Last edited by The Big Dunn; 01-21-2020, 12:23 PM.
How come when these questions are asked no one ever just puts the resumes side by side and looks at them? Oh yeah, because once you do that anyone picking Manny looks silly.
How come when these questions are asked no one ever just puts the resumes side by side and looks at them? Oh yeah, because once you do that anyone picking Manny looks silly.
Comment