Floyd's Illegal IV; A Prefight Ritual Or A One-Time Thing?

[N/A]

So the NSAC were notified or not??? Because they released their initial statement and said they were upset and weren’t notified when they should be.
So they lied the next day that they were???

Because IV was 100% legal in Nevada, it was USADA's position that their obligation was to notify Nevada of the TUE application either being approved or denied, not that a TUE had been asked for. Hence waiting until it was approved to notify Nevada.

Nevada purposely misled the public after Hauser's hit piece to try to save face. For instance, Bennett said:

" [NSAC] is the sole authority that can authorize a the****utic-use exemption for a fighter in the state of Nevada.”

Sounds like Nevada is taking a strong position, but the truth is that IV was legal in Nevada, therefore there was no need to ask Nevada for an exemption. The voluntary additional restrictions Floyd and Manny agreed to said any IV use would need to be confirmed by USADA as being for medical reasons. Which USADA confirmed. Most people are idiots and don't understand the nuance of this stuff. So Bennett says a few strong words to save face, even though they were meaningless.

Making diarrhea bs, if he had then we’d be reading about it by now.

Reading about it how? His medical information is confidential.

So you are justifying everything base on usada being there? When that organization is clearly under floyd and haymon’s pocket???

Nonsense conspiracy theory with no evidence. USADA is the official Olympic drug testing agency of the United States. The federal government gives them $10 million a year. They have plenty of funding. Are you suggesting all the doctors that evaluated the TUE are in Floyd's pocket too? Even though they have no way of knowing the application belongs to Floyd?


[quote]So were just gonna turn a blind eye and play were dumb that we don’t know how to read between the lines and connect the dots that the amount floyd used is exactly then same as Lance armstrong’s technique???[quote]

USADA ARE THE ONES THAT TOOK DOWN LANCE ARMSTRONG!!! An American hero, with all of the money in the world to pay off USADA if USADA was able to be paid off.

Your conspiracy theory is ridiculous. USADA would have LOVED to have busted Floyd if they caught him doing anything wrong. But the truth is very boring. USADA followed Floyd around all day. He took a drug test already during the day. He never left USADA's sight. He fell ill, USADA witnessed it, they witnessed the IV, which was just salt water and vitamins. They gave him another drug test right after the IV as well just to be safe.

[N/A]

So you sure USADA ain’t shady AF?

There's no reason to believe they are. They're funded by the US government and had no problem bringing down American hero Lance Armstrong.

[N/A]

IV's pref fight do one thing FLUSH OUT EPO's.

But Floyd was forced to take a drug test immediately BEFORE the IV was administered. So how would the IV help with that?

[N/A]

It was a cover up.

Think about how ****** that is. If USADA was trying to protect Floyd:

#1 - Why not look the other way when he sought IV treatment?
#2 - Why make him file a TUE?
#3 - Why tell anybody about the TUE?

You're not making any sense. If Floyd and USADA were in cahoots, WE WOULDN'T KNOW ABOUT ANY OF THIS! NOBODY would know Floyd took an IV unless USADA told us. So they're covering up the thing we only know about because they DIDN'T cover it up?!?

the Nevada State Athletic Commission said USADA was not authorized to grant an exemption

IV was legal in Nevada, so it was really none of their business. USADA doesn't have the authority to grant an exemption to a Nevada rule, but that's not what they did. They granted an exemption to a USADA rule. Nevada had absolutely nothing to do with anything.

[PAC-BOY]

he took the additional step of applying for a TUE after the IV infusion was administered in order remain in compliance with the USADA program. Although Mr. Mayweather’s application was not approved until after his fight with Mr. Pacquiao


This is the quote from your post .

and on top of that Floyd had the shlt done in his house.

WADA rules do not allow intravenous infusions or injections of more than 50 milliliters per six hours "except for those legitimately received in the course of hospital admissions, surgical procedures, or clinical investigations.

Mayweather's medical team told the collection agents that the IV -- which reportedly included a 250-milliliter mixture of saline and multivitamins and a 500-milliliter mixture of saline and Vitamin C

Completely masking PEDs - Got caught. and covered it up.

[daggum]

But Floyd was forced to take a drug test immediately BEFORE the IV was administered. So how would the IV help with that?

piss not blood. keep deflecting you stooge. floyd got caught cheating and bribed usada to cover for him. 150k! oh wow they covered up floyds cheating and gave him a tue what a shocker! the miracle of money!

[PAC-BOY]

Think about how ****** that is. If USADA was trying to protect Floyd:

#1 - Why not look the other way when he sought IV treatment?
#2 - Why make him file a TUE?
#3 - Why tell anybody about the TUE?

You're not making any sense. If Floyd and USADA were in cahoots, WE WOULDN'T KNOW ABOUT ANY OF THIS! NOBODY would know Floyd took an IV unless USADA told us. So they're covering up the thing we only know about because they DIDN'T cover it up?!?

1.2.3. Easy. Floyd ***ed up. Simple as that, They made a mistake. And couldn't cover it up.

USADA gave him an exemption. However, Nevada State Athletic Commission executive director Bob Bennett said USADA does not have authorization to grant an exemption. Bennett said only the commission, which was not notified of the exemption until after it was given, can give an athlete an exemption.IV was legal in Nevada, so it was really none of their business. USADA doesn't have the authority to grant an exemption to a Nevada rule, but that's not what they did. They granted an exemption to a USADA rule. Nevada had absolutely nothing to do with anything.

1.2.3. Easy. Floyd ***ed up. Simple as that, They made a mistake. And couldn't cover it up. Although the substances contained in the IV were not banned by WADA, whose standards USADA says it follows, the fact that they were given intravenously was not allowed. Especially at his house!!!

USADA gave him an exemption. However, Nevada State Athletic Commission executive director Bob Bennett said USADA does not have authorization to grant an exemption. Bennett said only the commission, which was not notified of the exemption until after it was given, can give an athlete an exemption.

[daggum]

the confused tard that goes by wbc wba ibf "it wasnt illegal!"

fast forward..."ok it was illegal but he took a piss test right before so it was ok"

not a surprise this guy would be confused. he thinks hes 3 different persons

[N/A]

Check the bold u just shut down your own argument it was made LEGAL after it was administered . How is there nothing shady about that bro ??

There's nothing shady about it at all. You're just not understanding the position you'd be putting the doping control officer in otherwise.

Think of it like this. Fighter A is claiming to have a medical emergency. Claiming it's a life or death situation. Every moment is supposedly absolutely critical to whether he lives or dies.

Doctor B rushes to the scene and recommends a treatment. The treatment he recommends violates the WADA code.

In that moment, is the USADA doping control officer supposed to decide if the treatment is medically necessary, and therefore eligible for a the****utic use exemptions? The DCO isn't a doctor. The DCO shouldn't have the pressure in a split second of having to make a life saving decision. That would be ridiculous.

So the very reasonable solution is that when there is an unexpected medical event, the doping control agent isn't expected to say yes or no to the treatment. They are expected to document the event and the fighter has an opportunity to prove the treatment was needed and ask for a retroactive exemption.

Very common. Nothing shady about it at all. The most reasonable way to deal with those situations.

[N/A]

I get it he got a tue but nsac didnt know about it

IV was 100% legal, in any amount, for any reasons, under the rules of Nevada. So why would Nevada need to be notified that an exemption to a USADA rule was being asked for? Nobody was asking for an exemption to a Nevada rule. It was none of Nevada's business. As a courtesy, Nevada was notified once the exemption request was ruled upon.