Comments Thread For: Team Usyk: Next Fight Should Happen March Or April, For WBO Title

[P4Pdunny]

that is a very unflattering photo

[Shadoww702]

Those were different situations. Canelo was stripped for refusing to fight his mando. Fury was stripped for being legally unable to fight his IBF mando due to him signing a rematch clause with Wlad, without notifying the IBF and getting their permission first.

I thought you had to fight your mando writhing one year??? So why strip him then???

Also 2 things.

1. I don’t think DAZN approved of Sergiy

2. I remember Canelo getting in a fight with Oscar over losing the belt. He didn’t know he puked lose it or something. But he was definitely pissed of at GB.


But go ahead and use the Canelo Duck excuse. In case you forgot Canelo just beat the guy that beat him...

[Shadoww702]

Both of them refused to fight the mandatory that was due next. That has nothing to do with stripping a unified champion for fighting the next mandatory instead of your mandatory.

So strip Fury for fighting Klitz when they had a signed rematch contract?? And demand he fight some bum??? That sounds Rtarded

[N/A]

So strip Fury for fighting Klitz when they had a signed rematch contract??

Tyson Fury was the WBA and WBO mandatory. The IBF mandatory was long overdue. As a condition of the IBF sanctioning the Klitschko vs. Fury fight, Klitschko and Fury both agreed in writing that the winner of their fight would fight Glozkov next.

As a mandatory, Fury had no obligation to agree to a rematch clause. He had a guaranteed title shot without a rematch clause.

Fury chose to sell Wladimir a rematch clause anyway, secretly, without the IBF's knowledge.

When Fury refused to fight Glazkov next, as he had already promised in writing, stripping him was automatic.

[Pigeons]

You ****ing fool, that "passing blurb" was written by Pat English, the most successful litigator in the history of boxing, who was single handedly responsible for the creation of the rotation system and successfully secured the federal ruling that enshrined the rotation system in law that exists to this day.

There is no rotation system in law. Each sanctioning organization is its own independent entity, are able to rule arbitrarily due to the nature of their bylaws, and are not dependent on the internal rulings of other, similarly independent, organizations.

[N/A]

There is no rotation system in law.

You're wrong. A federal court ruled that all of the sanctioning bodies MUST follow a rotation system. If they refuse to honor the rotation system, they'd be defying a federal court ruling and would be risking a massive lawsuit.

[Pigeons]

You're wrong. A federal court ruled that all of the sanctioning bodies MUST follow a rotation system. If they refuse to honor the rotation system, they'd be defying a federal court ruling and would be risking a massive lawsuit.

They ain't gonna do sh**t.

[N/A]

They ain't gonna do sh**t.

Clearly the sanctioning bodies disagree. 30 years later and not once have they had the balls to ignore the rotation system.

[MEXICAN STYLE]

Better not fight some dishwasher