What do you think about the impending Charlo vs Eubank fight?

[Curt Henning]

Spence doesn’t need opponents, I understand that.

Crawford has been asking for Spence and Pacquiao, not Porter. So I’m not sure why he would take the risk to fight Porter.

im not sure i remember him or bradley saying "spence or pac" when theyre on tv saying hell fight anybody...i seem to remember crawford sitting down with ward and saying "ill fight anybody"....

and ummm...he had pac right there in his own company to make a fight with and didnt get it done lol...whatever the reason is/was doesnt matter...he messed up or someone in the company messed up and didnt get the job done for him

[LA_2_Vegas]

Seeing Eubank getting his head violently snapped back in the first minute of the fight against Korobov was pretty alarming sign for the rest of that fight....maybe lucky that it ended like it did, it was not a good start at all. Luckily, Charlo isn't a southpaw.....these two styles should make for a good, gritty fight.

I thought Brandon Adams was getting inside and under Charlo way too easily - he got him into some bad positions but was not effective, missed a lot on a open target (very similar to Porter's ineffective aggression vs Spence).....I think Eubank would be taking advantage of that if he got him inside. I always liked Eubank's ability to fight inside(when he's not smothering himself) and I think Charlo looked a bit confused when Adams was in on him, got squared up and looked open.

Charlo has a nice jab...but he and Jermell have been abandoning it for power....so if there's no Charlo jab, Eubank can probably get in there and that's where he's pretty good ....good Charlo jab then I think he can control the overall pace of the fight and get the W

[Curt Henning]

Seeing Eubank getting his head violently snapped back in the first minute of the fight against Korobov was pretty alarming sign for the rest of that fight....maybe lucky that it ended like it did, it was not a good start at all. Luckily, Charlo isn't a southpaw.....these two styles should make for a good, gritty fight.

I thought Brandon Adams was getting inside and under Charlo way too easily - he got him into some bad positions but was not effective, missed a lot on a open target (very similar to Porter's ineffective aggression vs Spence).....I think Eubank would be taking advantage of that if he got him inside. I always liked Eubank's ability to fight inside(when he's not smothering himself) and I think Charlo looked a bit confused when Adams was in on him, got squared up and looked open.

Charlo has a nice jab...but he and Jermell have been abandoning it for power....so if there's no Charlo jab, Eubank can probably get in there and that's where he's pretty good ....good Charlo jab then I think he can control the overall pace of the fight and get the W

i agree i would have liked to have seen how the matty fight would have played out...im not sure it would have been good for eubank.....ive never been a big fan of eubank to be honest...

[N/A]

Why do we need to see Charlo fight a guy who is 1-2 in his last 3 fights?

PBC is building towards Charlo vs. Eubank.

The top four middleweights in boxrec right now are:

#1 - Canelo
#2 - GGG
#3 - Eubank
#4 - Charlo

By the time Eubank fights Charlo, Canelo will have been removed from the middleweight division and will likely have vacated his middleweight world title.

So Charlo vs. Eubank will be a WBC/WBA world middleweight title unification fight, and the #2 and #3 middleweights in the world fighting each other.

[Curt Henning]

PBC is building towards Charlo vs. Eubank.

The top four middleweights in boxrec right now are:

#1 - Canelo
#2 - GGG
#3 - Eubank
#4 - Charlo

By the time Eubank fights Charlo, Canelo will have been removed from the middleweight division and will likely have vacated his middleweight world title.

So Charlo vs. Eubank will be a WBC/WBA world middleweight title unification fight, and the #2 and #3 middleweights in the world fighting each other.

dont go talking about boxrec rankings because ive been told only an idiot would believe in them......because somehow andrade being an unbeaten champ means something....because beating alantez fox is somehow better than fighting guys like bjs, groves and degale.....ive been told nobody should rate anyone like eubank over andrade because of andrades stellar resume and career lol

[N/A]

dont go talking about boxrec rankings because ive been told only an idiot would believe in them......because somehow andrade being an unbeaten champ means something....because beating alantez fox is somehow better than fighting guys like bjs, groves and degale.....ive been told nobody should rate anyone like eubank over andrade because of andrades stellar resume and career lol

Trolls hate boxrec because boxrec cuts through all the bull****. **** the bias. **** the belts. **** who you're a fan of. Tally up all the wins and losses and let's see who really have proved what. Boxrec is every troll's kryptonite.

[Curt Henning]

Trolls hate boxrec because boxrec cuts through all the bull****. **** the bias. **** the belts. **** who you're a fan of. Tally up all the wins and losses and let's see who really have proved what. Boxrec is every troll's kryptonite.

im somehow supposed to be blown away with andrade because hes unbeaten and has a belt or something...thats what i was told...lol

forget looking at quality of opposition or anything like that! lol

[ShoulderRoll]

If you prefer to see Charlo fight Eubank Jr instead of Demetrius Andrade then I really don't know what to tell you.

[Curt Henning]

If you prefer to see Charlo fight Eubank Jr instead of Demetrius Andrade then I really don't know what to tell you.

eubank has fought bjs, degale, and groves...

who has andrade fought that excites me to see him fight anyone?

[ShoulderRoll]

eubank has fought bjs, degale, and groves...

who has andrade fought that excites me to see him fight anyone?

So you think Eubank Jr would give Charlo a more competitive fight than Andrade?