Mayweather wins another fighter of the decade award

[GhostofDempsey]

It is meaningless.

Nothing you say or do will change that.

I bet you it doesn't hold that much weight to you now, does it?

Floyd can buy and win all the awards he wants. He is still a fraud. Get over it.

[Marchegiano]

What does that have to do with what I say about the BBC "fake news"???

I was ****ing with you. BN doesn't give out awards either and were also speculating on the writer's award like the BBC.

I don't think anyone really cares about the difference between a yahoo award and a first choice from another publication.

[aboutfkntime]

Stay in the red ‘tard.

your earlier comment... was just another shlthead post, from a shlthead poster

dumb casual-fan fool

[aboutfkntime]

Floyd can buy and win all the awards he wants. He is still a fraud. Get over it.

stop crying you lame ret4rd

why are you butthurt... ?

1) a PROVEN dopey casual-fan, who says the dumbest things
2) appears to have a irrational hatred for Mayweather

hmmm

you wouldn't happen to be just another silly pac-tard, would you?

[Johnwoo8686]

fighting for only half decade should not be enough, you cant win the superbowl at halftime even if you are already winning 50-0...

You don't have to fight for a full decade to win fighter of the decade. For example: Sugar Ray Leonard didn't fight for three years during the 80's and still won fighter of the decade in the 1980's. Muhammad Ali was banned for three years in the 1960's and still won fighter of the decade.

[GhostofDempsey]

stop crying you lame ret4rd

why are you butthurt... ?

1) a PROVEN dopey casual-fan, who says the dumbest things
2) appears to have a irrational hatred for Mayweather

hmmm

you wouldn't happen to be just another silly pac-tard, would you?

Look at you pathetic azzholes, he wins an award and you are still crying. Lose the inferiority complex already. LMAO.

[hugh grant]

You don't have to fight for a full decade to win fighter of the decade. For example: Sugar Ray Leonard didn't fight for three years during the 80's and still won fighter of the decade in the 1980's. Muhammad Ali was banned for three years in the 1960's and still won fighter of the decade.

But these were all or nothing fighters when they fought.
Floyd s body of work isn't that strong.
Nelo was a cw and lacked experience at highest kevel, Pac was jmm used goods and so much controversy with IV, and bad shoulder, not to mention poor performance and poor spectacle that Floyd shouldn't even be given much credit for win. Far too cautious

Srl and Ali not fighting much was out of their control. Floyd s was of his own doing. You can't expect to win Fotd only having fought 5-6 years and only fighting once in those years. You can't be that arrogant. Floyd should have felt he needed to beat spence, thurman, Crawford and still not feel anything's garanteed. The fans deserved those fights. Floyd risked his Life far less than peers

[PAC-BOY]

That's WBN, SportingNews, and Yahoo?

Three shlt sites that freelancers cover sports. Yay!

[icha]

You don't have to fight for a full decade to win fighter of the decade. For example: Sugar Ray Leonard didn't fight for three years during the 80's and still won fighter of the decade in the 1980's. Muhammad Ali was banned for three years in the 1960's and still won fighter of the decade.

2 or 3 years is one thing, half decade is way too much...
dont get me wrong, to me floyd is an atg, and no doubt the best from 2005 to 2015... but thats not a decade... floyd is top 5 ATG imho...
he should be awarded for more than just a decade...

[IronDanHamza]

Floyd can buy and win all the awards he wants. He is still a fraud. Get over it.

Oh yeah, of course.

Floyd "brought" the awards

What a dummy you are