Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Joshua: We Unified in 20 Fights, Wilder Has Not in 40 - Why Not?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Lies

    #1 he didn't unify, those belts really all belong to fury if we being honest. However, he beat the past champion for the belts, then bet parker for the wbo. The reason deontay didn't have a chance to unify is because you keep running, or trying to get a ridiculous split but after that l the split should be 60/40 wilder. When wilder knocks you out we will not be surprised because we already seen you get yoru ass whipped.

    Comment


    • #82
      He didn't unify because you turned down $50 million to fight him.

      Comment


      • #83
        Weak

        This dude lost to the overweight mexicano and has the nerve to talk about wilder???.....I cant wait for wilder to knock him out!!!.....as soon as wilder puts the bum fury down Joshua better be ready!!!!.....

        Comment


        • #84
          No.....#1 nothing belongs to fury!!!....he is a bum that couldn't control his addictions so he deserves nothing!!....#2 Joshua will get nothing but a beat down when...AND IF.....he sees wilder!!!

          Comment


          • #85
            Because in 2016 Josh said he wouldn't be ready until 2020

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post
              Breazeale is a bum. Ortiz is the only decent name on his resume. He hasn’t beaten Fury yet. Resume is truly abysmal.

              Don’t care what Joshua has done, who he has lost to, because he has beaten better guys and more of them than Wilder.
              Since you don't care about who he fought or lost to, then why did you reply to my post? Have a Happy New Year, and enjoy the Heavyweight Super Fight, Wilder vs. Fury II on February 22nd!

              Comment


              • #87
                The level of ******ity from Wilder fans on here, is what makes it hard to debate on things of this matter. Look up Wilder's purses from his previous fights. And by that I mean, the ones that they actually announced because the last couple they have tried to hide and lie about.
                Wilder 1.4 million Stiverne 500k
                Wilder 2.1 million Ortiz 500k
                Wilder 900k Washington 200k
                Wilder 1.5 million Arreola 150k
                Wilder's team has been paying these guys pennies for years with his one belt. Where was all the outrage when he was underpaying guys then? How does a guy with 1 belt, who averages 1-2 million per fight, who cannot sell out an arena, how does he deserve 50-50 with a guy who has THREE BELTS, sells out soccer stadiums and is a PPV star? Just off the belts alone, the pay should be in favor of AJ hahah. But add in all the rest and it should be a no brainer. But Wilder's fans have no brain, so they bring up the fake 50 million email and try to spin the 120 million dollar real offer. But none of you will answer the question that AJ is asking. Why has Wilder not unified in all these years? He has sat on that WBC belt, fighting bums and gatekeepers while avoiding the best fighters like Klitschko, Haye, Povetkin, Whyte, AJ and others. But he fights Ortiz and Fury (both of whom were caught on steroids) an now he is the hardest hitter of all time and worth 50-50?? No man, he's a bum beating fraud.

                Comment


                • #88
                  A fight with the winner of Wilder-Fury shouldn''t be too difficult to make; joint promotion, everything 50/50, rematch clause 60/40 to winner,, fight wherever generates the most $$$. All three fighters claim to be their own bosses so it doesn't matter what Hearns, Warren, Arum or haymon say . . . .

                  Hahahaha.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    Originally posted by SplitSecond View Post
                    Bought a title from Charles Martin, cherrypickin, protected, w/e else excuse you have, and yet, somehow has a better resume than Wilder.

                    This forum is too much.
                    Martin was the path of the least resistance. They offered him a lot of money for the fight and Martin took it. They have been offering so much money to face AJ that everybody is lining up. It was not like AJ faced murder's row to get the belts. He beat Wlad to get the WBA when Wlad was beaten by Fury and was coming off a long layoff. The only real title fight he had was against Parker which went with the highest bidder.

                    Never said that Wilder's resume was better. He is making claim that he unified in 20 fights when fame and fortune had a lot to do with it. Keep it within the theme.

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Originally posted by STREET CLEANER View Post
                      Martin was the path of the least resistance. They offered him a lot of money for the fight and Martin took it. They have been offering so much money to face AJ that everybody is lining up. It was not like AJ faced murder's row to get the belts. He beat Wlad to get the WBA when Wlad was beaten by Fury and was coming off a long layoff. The only real title fight he had was against Parker which went with the highest bidder.

                      Never said that Wilder's resume was better. He is making claim that he unified in 20 fights when fame and fortune had a lot to do with it. Keep it within the theme.
                      Good post! Belts mean nothing! Who did you beat for the belt is what's important! That's why Fury is the man (who beat the man), until someone beats him! I'm rooting for Wilder, but I have a lot of respect for Fury because a) He accepted the fight b) Came to the U.S. c) Performed very well d) Accepted the rematch!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP