If Pacquiao doesn’t get Spence next, PBC has nothing to offer him

[ShaneMosleySr]

115-112 on two cards is convincing. No one cried robbery, the press all thought Pacquiao won and no one is calling for a rematch:

It was a good fight and a close fight but it was a convincing win for Pacquiao.

You’re also missing my point. It’s not about what’s a good fight. It’s about if any of those fights have anything to offer Pacquiao. They don’t. He already beat Thurman and no one is debating it. So why do it again? Why fight two guys who lost to a guy he beat? There’s no reason too. It’s Spence or bust.

A razor thin split decision that Pac was out landed (both power punches and total punches) is convincingly? Douche bag.

Pac vs Porter, Garcia, Spence, Thurman rematch are all good fights. Only a true douche bag (you) would think otherwise.

[Roadblock]

The Rios fight happened 7 years ago when Pacquiao wasn’t towards the end of career.

Rios has also beaten every opponent he had faced at the time.

Algeri was undefeated, the fight was six years ago when Pacquiao wasn’t at the end of his career and the fight happened because Pacquiao couldn’t negotiate a deal to face Marquez.

Jessie Vargas held a welterweight title and Pacquiao didn’t at the time, so he fought him to win the title.

The Horn fight happened because Pacquiao-Khan fell through and the Queensland government financed the fight and made Pacquiao a ton of money.

Matthysse held a welterweight title and Pacquiao didnt. So he picked an easy mark to win a belt.

Adrien Broner was an introduction to PBC fight. He was the easiest mark they could find for Pacquiao while being able to justify putting it on PPV.

Mayweather fought Andre Berto in his fairwell fight and Berto lost to a guy with 8 losses two fights before his fight with mayweather.

Rios’ record at the time was better than Porter’s is now.

Rios came of losing to Alvarado, neither are top WWs

Algieri came of a gift to Ruslan, B grade guys, Chris had maybe 2 tkos in his career over guys that a 94% losing record . this level of fighter does not deserve a Manny fight, they were give me fights and Mannys fans think great.

Berto was his last fight, that makes a lot of difference.

If Manny wants a farewell fight I dont care if he fights a D grader he earned it, but if he wants to box on at top level then fight the top guys of your division, dont pick soft touches while the likes of Porter is available.

On one hand you guys say he should have the easier fights and on the other hand they are hyped up as the best guys, well in my book Rios Algieri Vargas Horn Broner Matthysse are B+ grade fighters

[RuleOfTheSpear]

115-112 on two cards is convincing. No one cried robbery, the press all thought Pacquiao won and no one is calling for a rematch:

It was a good fight and a close fight but it was a convincing win for Pacquiao.

You’re also missing my point. It’s not about what’s a good fight. It’s about if any of those fights have anything to offer Pacquiao. They don’t. He already beat Thurman and no one is debating it. So why do it again? Why fight two guys who lost to a guy he beat? There’s no reason too. It’s Spence or bust.

Thurman's fights with Porter and Danny were much closer and Thurman has yet to give them their rematches.

[thedarkdragon11]

Lipinets and Guerrero... Spence is still possible...

[Curtis Harper]

PBC is Pac's only option ?
If Pac is too old to fight legit comp, he should retire ( )

[Ca$ual Fan]

Lipinets and Guerrero... Spence is still possible...

Guerrero? Who Robert Guerrero?? LMAO

Go feed him to Ugas as a stay busy fight

I'd pick Khan over Guerrero too