If Pacquiao doesn’t get Spence next, PBC has nothing to offer him

[ShaneMosleySr]

I mentioned why none of them are good options for Pacquiao in the opening post.

Pacquiao already beat Thurman.

Porter lost to Spence and Thurman.

Garcia lost to Porter and Thurman.

If you have anything to counter those facts or a great option at welterweight for pacquiao who’s a PBC fighter, please let us know!

You know who they are douche bag

[just the facts]

I mentioned why none of them are good options for Pacquiao in the opening post.

Pacquiao already beat Thurman.

Porter lost to Spence and Thurman.

Garcia lost to Porter and Thurman.

If you have anything to counter those facts or a great option at welterweight for pacquiao who’s a PBC fighter, please let us know!

Douche bag, Pac barely beat Thurman and outside of Crawford, all of the others bring at least as much to the table as anyone else.

Are you another PBC hating douche bag?

[Roadblock]

I mentioned why none of them are good options for Pacquiao in the opening post.

Pacquiao already beat Thurman.

Porter lost to Spence and Thurman.

Garcia lost to Porter and Thurman.

If you have anything to counter those facts or a great option at welterweight for pacquiao who’s a PBC fighter, please let us know!

And I pointed out that Manny has a history of fighting guys coming of loses or on the heals of their career biggest loses .

So why say he cant fight them off loses when he does indeed fight guys off loses.

[ShaneMosleySr]

He didn’t barely beat Thurman. He convincingly beat Thurman.

What would beating the guy who lost to Spence and Thurman do for his legacy? What would the beating the guy who lost to Thurman and Porter do for his legacy?

Nothing. So PBC has nothing to offer him besides Spence.

Douche bag, Pac barely beat Thurman and outside of Crawford, all of the others bring at least as much to the table as anyone else.

Are you another PBC hating douche bag?

[ShaneMosleySr]

He can fight them, I’m just pointing out that they offer nothing.

They won’t enhance his legacy, they’re not easy fights and they’re not name opponents.

And I pointed out that Manny has a history of fighting guys coming of loses or on the heals of their career biggest loses .

So why say he cant fight them off loses when he does indeed fight guys off loses.

[Roadblock]

He can fight them, I’m just pointing out that they offer nothing.

They won’t enhance his legacy, they’re not easy fights and they’re not name opponents.

They are better wins than Rios Algieri Vargas Horn Matthysse Broner. How did these guys enhance his legacy when they are really B+ grade fighters.

Floyd would never live it down fighting the likes of Rios in his first fight at 147 coming of a loss. Floyd would be crucified fighting any off those guys.

And thats what makes me laugh, oh he cant fight Porter but Rios was worthy .

[ShaneMosleySr]

The Rios fight happened 7 years ago when Pacquiao wasn’t towards the end of career.

Rios has also beaten every opponent he had faced at the time.

Algeri was undefeated, the fight was six years ago when Pacquiao wasn’t at the end of his career and the fight happened because Pacquiao couldn’t negotiate a deal to face Marquez.

Jessie Vargas held a welterweight title and Pacquiao didn’t at the time, so he fought him to win the title.

The Horn fight happened because Pacquiao-Khan fell through and the Queensland government financed the fight and made Pacquiao a ton of money.

Matthysse held a welterweight title and Pacquiao didnt. So he picked an easy mark to win a belt.

Adrien Broner was an introduction to PBC fight. He was the easiest mark they could find for Pacquiao while being able to justify putting it on PPV.

Mayweather fought Andre Berto in his fairwell fight and Berto lost to a guy with 8 losses two fights before his fight with mayweather.

Rios’ record at the time was better than Porter’s is now.

They are better wins than Rios Algieri Vargas Horn Matthysse Broner. How did these guys enhance his legacy when they are really B+ grade fighters.

Floyd would never live it down fighting the likes of Rios in his first fight at 147 coming of a loss. Floyd would be crucified fighting any off those guys.

And thats what makes me laugh, oh he cant fight Porter but Rios was worthy .

[just the facts]

He didn’t barely beat Thurman. He convincingly beat Thurman.

What would beating the guy who lost to Spence and Thurman do for his legacy? What would the beating the guy who lost to Thurman and Porter do for his legacy?

Nothing. So PBC has nothing to offer him besides Spence.

A razor thin split decision that Pac was out landed (both power punches and total punches) is convincingly? Douche bag.

Pac vs Porter, Garcia, Spence, Thurman rematch are all good fights. Only a true douche bag (you) would think otherwise.

[Boxfan7819]

Rios was off a loss, Porter is twice Rios and Mannys opponents have often come of a bad loss inside their last couple of fights.

Porter is a good fight, too good for Manny I think and Spence is damaged until we see that he isnt damaged in the ring.

They will fight Danny Garcia who is being groomed to fight Manny.

Manny is 42 years old and Porter used to get schooled in sparring against Manny back in the day. Spence is not damaged he didn't break any bones. Thurman was undefeated when Manny beat him at his old age.

[RuleOfTheSpear]

There's really no point for Pac to face Porter or Danny.

What would that gain for his legacy?

Spence is the only one at PBC that would mean something for his legacy because as of now, Pac is yet to win a unification fight in his career.