Why does boxing still have three judges scoring a fight?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HitmanTommy
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Dec 2018
    • 4386
    • 662
    • 82
    • 294,278

    #1

    Why does boxing still have three judges scoring a fight?

    Too much room for corruption. Boxing scoring seriously needs an overhaul.
  • TheBoxingBanger
    Contender
    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
    • Sep 2009
    • 449
    • 45
    • 15
    • 12,823

    #2
    I've been saying this forever.

    If not a major over-haul.... we at least need 5 judges on championship fights.

    The judges would need to be about 3 feet above ring height also. That will obstruct some fan's seats, but... figure it out

    Comment

    • Zelda
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2019
      • 2070
      • 393
      • 73
      • 19,172

      #3
      Don't worry...in future AI will be in control of everything and we won't even need the judges. Deep learning to the rescue!

      Comment

      • Curtis Harper
        Banned
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Dec 2018
        • 10114
        • 254
        • 446
        • 303,080

        #4
        So...what is the alternative(s) ???

        Comment

        • sargo
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Apr 2007
          • 1230
          • 174
          • 10
          • 16,360

          #5
          No 10-9 point must. If the round looks like a draw, score it a draw.

          Take away confusing language like ring generalship - just used as an excuse to give a round to a favored fighter. Give the round to the one who hurt the other more. That's it.

          Comment

          • Murcielago
            Interim Champion
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Dec 2003
            • 712
            • 103
            • 14
            • 34,225

            #6
            I like the idea of having 5 judges but only using the 3 scores that are closest to each other each round.

            Comment

            • JakeTheBoxer
              undisputed champion
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Dec 2014
              • 20942
              • 4,573
              • 2,781
              • 123,960

              #7
              I agree, there should be 5 judges.

              Comment

              • YoungManRumble
                Paper Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2019
                • 9847
                • 2,129
                • 975
                • 33,413

                #8
                Originally posted by Curtis Harper
                So...what is the alternative(s) ???
                Yeah what great constructive criticism. So much room for corruption, needs overhaul. Doesn't even offer an inkling of a suggestion or idea.

                Comment

                • Curtis Harper
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2018
                  • 10114
                  • 254
                  • 446
                  • 303,080

                  #9
                  Originally posted by YoungManRumble
                  Yeah what great constructive criticism. So much room for corruption, needs overhaul. Doesn't even offer an inkling of a suggestion or idea.
                  He got the ball rolling

                  Comment

                  • Curtis Harper
                    Banned
                    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                    • Dec 2018
                    • 10114
                    • 254
                    • 446
                    • 303,080

                    #10
                    Originally posted by JakeTheBoxer
                    I agree, there should be 5 judges.
                    The crowd should have a say

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP