Does PBC/Wilder have the dumbest fanbase in boxing?

[REDEEMER]

If anyone has a few minutes to watch here’s a video that could easily explain the Wilder fan base phenomena on here ,the fan base is beyond out of touch .

I found a very accurate watch here , Why Incompetent People Think They’re Competent video in link , Ha


https://********/y50i1bI2uN4

[uppercut510]

These limeys are spamming the forum worse than Pac ta rds did in their prime

So many threads *****ing about Wilder, Wilder's fans, the secret youtube society known as LDBC and of course CBS owning boxingscene

It's getting pathetic now **** is not that serious take a step back and relax

It wasn't Wilder or his fanbase the one that slapped AJ around in NYC and made him quit smh..

its becoming sickening to even bare, like wtf is going on? then they try to force the narrative that wilder fans are the problem, some may be overboard but they aren't the ones starting all these ****** pointless threads

[uppercut510]

I've never understood posters that go in the same kind of threads constantly and cry about the thread. If you don't like it why do you keep entering the threads? Makes no damn sense.

I guess its the same reason you constantly cry about a guy but make him your avatar picture? maybe we are all just crazy

[BillyBoxing]

British fans, without a doubt. I have 15 pages of exhibit from yesterday alone.

"If A, then B." Somehow, that doesn't mean A is a condition of B. (British logic)

at least there is a logic with the brit...

[NaijaD]

I think rabid fans are terrible no matter what side they are on..... OP is one of them but I do think PBC fans are definitely the dumbest.

I read one of them say Charlo shouldn’t accept $7m to fight Andrade because he’s not a big name. Like how does that compute? People avoid no name fighters because they don’t get paid well enough, like how dumb are these guys.

[GhostofDempsey]

They need 50 IQ points just to be an assh0le. Seriously, anyone who is a fan of a promoter/manager/network is a lost cause.

[Robbie Barrett]

its becoming sickening to even bare, like wtf is going on? then they try to force the narrative that wilder fans are the problem, some may be overboard but they aren't the ones starting all these ****** pointless threads

PBC fans aren't making ****** threads?


Usyk is going make Chisora look bad and AJ will get KO'd

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=836050

do you ever hear the pbc guys complaining and whining?

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=836089

The king is back laughing at the haters. ESJ Man down

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showthread.php?t=836091

[GGG Gloveking]

You said A is a condition of B. Like that was a fact. I've just proven you wrong. At least acknowledge it instead of deflecting.

Can I ask you an honest question, so I can assess whether you are simply trolling, or whether this is your actual level of intellect? What is your level of education? Are you collegiately educated?

I graduated high school with a 3.4 and roughly 1300 SAT (it was 1600 max then) I went to VCU/MCV for a couple of semsters, where I had a 3.2 in premedical Biology Studies, before being disqualified for Federal Aid and having to drop out. Later, I've gone back to an American Bar Association affiliated program at the community college where I just finished my first semester of Law and Paralegal Studies with a perfect 4.0. I'm not an idiot.

As a part of my legal studies, I have to learn logical and deductive reasoning. What you are doing here, besides the false equivalency of creating a multi-faceted web of options in place of a linear one, is a basic logical flaw of thinking that because another option to obtain B exists (even though in the instant case we were examining, no evidence at that point existed of such alternate option), that it somehow disproves the relationship between A and B. To disprove this relationship, you must prove that the hypothesis (A), would yield a different result besides the conclusion (B). Speaking to your restaurant-eat example, you would have to show where going to the restaurant yields another result than eating.

But the statement "If A, then B" is a rudimentary statement of logic.

[Robbie Barrett]

Can I ask you an honest question, so I can assess whether you are simply trolling, or whether this is your actual level of intellect? What is your level of education? Are you collegiately educated?

I graduated high school with a 3.4 and roughly 1300 SAT (it was 1600 max then) I went to VCU/MCV for a couple of semsters, where I had a 3.2 in premedical Biology Studies, before being disqualified for Federal Aid and having to drop out. Later, I've gone back to an American Bar Association affiliated program at the community college where I just finished my first semester of Law and Paralegal Studies with a perfect 4.0. I'm not an idiot.

As a part of my legal studies, I have to learn logical and deductive reasoning. What you are doing here, besides the false equivalency of creating a multi-faceted web of options in place of a linear one, is a basic logical flaw of thinking that because another option to obtain B exists (even though in the instant case we were examining, no evidence at that point existed of such alternate option), that it somehow disproves the relationship between A and B. To disprove this relationship, you must prove that the hypothesis (A), would yield a different result besides the conclusion (B). Speaking to your restaurant-eat example, you would have to show where going to the restaurant yields another result than eating.

But the statement "If A, then B" is a rudimentary statement of logic.

Another option of B does exist though. Wilder could have gone straight to B. You're saying that wasn't possible but can't show any evidence that was ruled out. If it's not ruled out then it's an option.

I'm glad you admit A is a condition of B doesn't mean you can't obtain B another way. You proved your own post BS.

[DaNeutral.]

Without a doubt the PBC Wilder fans are the worst and most moronic of boxings fan bases. It's quite embarrassing reading their content sometimes cuz alot of what they said is either made up spin or some real misinformation that can always and easily be pulled apart. But then they stick to it and hide behind it.

Look at them defending charlo ducking that huge offer from hearn to face Andrade. To start with Charlo asked for that fight and Charlo hasn't even turned it down yet but the excuses are already turning up on here in preparation.

If rather they were here than not here though. Their posts are embarrassing but funny at the same time.