Comments Thread For: Hearn Offers Charlo One-Fight Deal For Andrade May Unification

[yankees7448]

The best way to avoid losing to Andrade is to not take a sucker deal to go fight Andrade as a one off on Andrade's platform with Andrade's promoter as the sole promoter of the event where all sorts of dirty tricks can be utilized to try to cheat Charlo.

What utter nonsense. By that token Charlo should never fight GGG because Andrade's promoter is also GGG's promoter. And Charlo should never fight Canelo because Golden Boy would use all kinds of dirty tricks to cheat Charlo.


Stop going to such ridiculous lengths to justify Charlo fighting turds. Lions Only right?

[yankees7448]

I pointed out, correctly, that based on YOUR theory, that Mayweather is the only star boxing ever had. His PPVs are so much higher than anybody else, that going by YOUR PPV theory, nobody has ever been a star other than Mayweather.

Once again, a strawman argument. Repeating it over and over again doesn't make it less of a strawman.

[Dreamer213]

First of all, he doesn't have more money than me. Second of all, plenty of people with a lot of money lack intelligence. He made his money with physical skill.

You have more money than Oscar??
What kinda multimillionaire spends all his time on a boxing forum?? Lol
But you really should look into Oscar's business ventures. He's been very successful with his business life once he quit fighting.
Golden Boy promotions, The Ring TV, the Houston Dynamo, and his Real Estate business to name a few.
Someone ****** wouldn't accomplish what Oscar has after retirement.

[Iamsmoke89]

If you don't know then why should he "take it"?

Bro y u come on here with the dumb shiiit

[N/A]

What utter nonsense. By that token Charlo should never fight GGG because Andrade's promoter is also GGG's promoter. And Charlo should never fight Canelo because Golden Boy would use all kinds of dirty tricks to cheat Charlo.

That is the risk that the B-side must take. That is why the A-side doesn't cross the street to fight a B-side. The B-side must cross the street. The B-side must agree to a rematch if they win the first fight. Etc.

[N/A]

Once again, a strawman argument. Repeating it over and over again doesn't make it less of a strawman.

"A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent."

The argument that was presented was that you can't be a star if someone else is doing way more PPVs than you. By that ridiculous criteria, Floyd Mayweather is the only star in boxing history. I am directly responding to the argument that was presented. I am not creating an argument nobody stated. You are completely misusing the term strawman.

[N/A]

You have more money than Oscar??

Yes.

What kinda multimillionaire spends all his time on a boxing forum??

One that inherited the fortune of a political dynasty without having to work for it.

But you really should look into Oscar's business ventures. He's been very successful with his business life once he quit fighting.

No he hasn't.

Golden Boy promotions

Golden Boy Promotions is losing money. He should have sold it for 100 million when he had the chance. He let his ego get in the way.

The Ring TV

The Ring is losing money.

[yankees7448]

That is the risk that the B-side must take. That is why the A-side doesn't cross the street to fight a B-side. The B-side must cross the street. The B-side must agree to a rematch if they win the first fight. Etc.

Neither guy is the A-side. Acting like they are will keep them the B-side forever.

[N/A]

Neither guy is the A-side.

Thank you for your inexperienced uneducated amateur opinion.

By every accepted metric in the industry, Charlo is the clear A-side in a hypothetical fight with Andrade.

Charlo is far more well known, having been seen by millions on Fox. Charlo holds the most widely recognized and prestigious championship. Charlo has years of being regularly featured on PBC while Andrade was stuck with a low rent promoter unable to get on US TV. Charlo has 3x as many social media followers as Andrade.

[yankees7448]

"A straw man is a form of argument and an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent."

The argument that was presented was that you can't be a star if someone else is doing way more PPVs than you.



By that ridiculous criteria, Floyd Mayweather is the only star in boxing history. I am directly responding to the argument that was presented. I am not creating an argument nobody stated. You are completely misusing the term strawman.

Thank you for proving my point. You fabricated your own definition of stardom, accused me of arguing in favor of that definition and then made that silly statement about Floyd Mayweather Jr being the only star boxing ever had as a follow up to that made up argument.