Can someone explain to me why wilder is allowed to get away with ducking whyte?

[GGG Gloveking]

This is all that needs to be said, it's an offer not a blocker like you and one or two other people have been trying to argue very unsuccessfully

An offer to fight Whyte, not AJ.

AJ would be round 2, assuming Wilder would be successful in round 1.

[GGG Gloveking]

He also cant seem to understand that an Article that mentions Hearn and the offer is not the same as Hearn himself commenting.

Here you go...

Around the :30 second mark.

https://********/U5FMUeumzXo

Hearn: I think the Wilder fight is one for next summer. I want him to fight Dillian Whyte. I mean, I've talked to his guys again today...

Reporter: Wilder?

Hearn: Yeah, Wilder fight Dillian Whyte...and the winner fights Josh.

[Robbie Barrett]

Here you go...

You're a idiot. Nobody is backing you because you're a idiot. The worse thing is i think you know you're wrong and a idiot, but you just can't admit to being wrong which makes you a bigger idiot. G'day idiot.

[GGG Gloveking]

You're a idiot. Nobody is backing you because you're a idiot. The worse thing is i think you know you're wrong and a idiot, but you just can't admit to being wrong which makes you a bigger idiot. G'day idiot.

It's AN idiot. You idiot.

"Yeah, Wilder fight Dillian Whyte and the winner fights Josh." -Eddie Hearn, Matchroom Promotions.

[Ray*]

What exactly is your interpretation of "Wilder will fight Dillian Whyte...and the winner fights Josh."

Your interpretation of lies.

[GGG Gloveking]

Your interpretation of lies.

Yes, I know Eddie was lying. He usually does.

What is your interpretation of this particular lie of Eddie?

Once again, Eddie said, "Wilder fight Dillian Whyte and the winner fights Josh." What is your interpretation of this?

[Ray*]

He cant tell the difference between someone making an offer and someone saying you have to fight "person A to get to person B".

He also cant seem to understand that an Article that mentions Hearn and the offer is not the same as Hearn himself commenting.

There are many interviews on YouTube in which Hearn addressed this matter clearly but these guys are purposely choosing to ignore this

Wait until they do the same with Charlo. Fact was Wilder avoided a career high payday at the time to fight Whyte, these people always try to re-write history, no where was Whyte been used to block anything.

Whyte until recently hates Joshua, he would never be used to block anyone, moreover Team Joshua made seprate offers to Wilder, but he would rather video himself crying on social media about how he was being ducked and dodge than accept the biggest offers on the table for him.

[Ray*]

Yes, I know Eddie was lying. He usually does.

What is your interpretation of this particular lie of Eddie?

Your lies in this thread. And you still continue to do so. Show us where he tried to use Whyte to block a Joshua/Wilder fight..

[LetOutTheCage]

You're a idiot. Nobody is backing you because you're a idiot. The worse thing is i think you know you're wrong and a idiot, but you just can't admit to being wrong which makes you a bigger idiot. G'day idiot.

He legit doesn't understand how offers work, its embarrassing

[Robbie Barrett]

Yes, I know Eddie was lying. He usually does.

What is your interpretation of this particular lie of Eddie?

Once again, Eddie said, "Wilder fight Dillian Whyte and the winner fights Josh." What is your interpretation of this?

Why are you ignoring what he said just before. That they planned the Joshua-Wilder fight for the summer but "I'd like him to fight Whyte"?

That completely destroys your argument in the same damn interview.