Can someone explain to me why wilder is allowed to get away with ducking whyte?

[Ray*]

Dude, I'm tired of your lies. Hearn said this in October, and the damn Parker fights wasn't signed for another whole month. In fact, you can hear Eddie talking sheit about Parker, and how Parker thinks he's entitled to a 50% split. So please, quit acting like when Hearn says "Wilder fights Dillian Whyte, then Josh," that he means anything other than the obvious, and that Hearn can see the future and know the Parker fight would be signed.

This is ludacris

No you are tired of the truth. You want to believe your own narratives. The fake narrative that you tried to sell here.

And none of us is having it. Fact was Whyte wasn’t a roadblock like you claimed. A genuine offer was made to Team Wilder to fight Whyte in England for early 2018.

The winner would have faced the Joshua/Parker winner at the end of 2018 like Hearn wanted.

Team Wilder ducked that career high payday and fought Ortiz for 2.1m.... Those are the facts. Deal with it.

[Robbie Barrett]

What does he say then, *******? Tell me, b itch, what fuçking words come out of Eddie's mouth? Eddie ****ing verbatim says "Wilder fights Dillian Whyte then Josh," and your ****** ass thinks it means something else.

You're an absolute idiot and locking yourself up for ****** poster of the year...

You're a tard and anyone that reads your posts in here will come to the same conclusion.

[GGG Gloveking]

No you are tired of the truth. You want to believe your own narratives. The fake narrative that you tried to sell here.

And none of us is having it. Fact was Whyte wasn’t a roadblock like you claimed. A genuine offer was made to Team Wilder to fight Whyte in England for early 2018.

The winner would have faced the Joshua/Parker winner at the end of 2018 like Hearn wanted.

Team Wilder ducked that career high payday and fought Ortiz for 2.1m.... Those are the facts. Deal with it.

So please tell me what does Eddie mean at the :30 second mark? What does "Whyte then Josh" mean?

The article was published in October. The Parker fight was not even agreed to at that point. You are lying if you say that Hearn meant Parker. Stop lying...

[GGG Gloveking]

You're a tard and anyone that reads your posts in here will come to the same conclusion.

What does "Whyte then Josh" mean, then??

[Robbie Barrett]

What does "Whyte then Josh" mean, then??

Let Hearn explain it to you tard.

“He doesn’t have to. It’s just a suggestion,” said Hearn to Behind The Gloves, when asked if Wilder still needs to fight Dillian Whyte in order to get the Joshua match. “Deontay Wilder has never boxed anyone of note, so Dillian Whyte is a real fight for him.

"A lot of people want to see Deontay Wilder fight someone of substance, but he wants to go straight into the Anthony Joshua fight without fighting anyone of substance. That’s not a problem for us either, so it’s to him.

"It was just a nice, friendly gesture to give Deontay Wilder his biggest purse ever by double. Come over to England and have a nice cup of tea, raise his profile, and then go fight Anthony Joshua after,” said Hearn.

https://www.givemesport.com/1192075-eddie-hearn-destroys-deontay-wilder-while-explaining-why-he-was-offered-dilian-whyte

[GGG Gloveking]

Let Hearn explain it to you tard.

“He doesn’t have to. It’s just a suggestion,” said Hearn to Behind The Gloves, when asked if Wilder still needs to fight Dillian Whyte in order to get the Joshua match. “Deontay Wilder has never boxed anyone of note, so Dillian Whyte is a real fight for him.

"A lot of people want to see Deontay Wilder fight someone of substance, but he wants to go straight into the Anthony Joshua fight without fighting anyone of substance. That’s not a problem for us either, so it’s to him.

"It was just a nice, friendly gesture to give Deontay Wilder his biggest purse ever by double. Come over to England and have a nice cup of tea, raise his profile, and then go fight Anthony Joshua after,” said Hearn.

https://www.givemesport.com/1192075-...d-dilian-whyte

If you read the phrase, "still needs to fight..." then you can understand that either the condition actually existed, or at least the author of the story interpreted Hearns words that way. So, either Hearn changed his stance, or else his unclear statement caused confusion. You can tell this from how the author makes the hypothetical comparison to DiBella telling Joshua to fight Miller.

It should be noted that your article was published two months after the one I cited.

[Robbie Barrett]

If you read the phrase, "still needs to fight..." then you can understand that either the condition actually existed, or at least the author of the story interpreted Hearns words that way. So, either Hearn changed his stance, or else his unclear statement caused confusion. You can tell this from how the author makes the hypothetical comparison to DiBella telling Joshua to fight Miller.

It should be noted that your article was published two months after the one I cited.

Maybe the author asked the question because that's what Wilders team claimed? Ever thought of that?

Two months? Your article was october this is from November. Brits actually write dates the right way, Day/Month/Year.

[GGG Gloveking]

Maybe the author asked the question because that's what Wilders team claimed? Ever thought of that?

Two months? Your article was october this is from November. Brits actually write dates the right way, Day/Month/Year.

No. Never considered a writer would ask a secondary source for an interpretation of another's words. I figure he'd read or hear Eddie's words and make his own conclusions. The plain language of the Fights Hub video is pretty clear and doesn't really need interpretation

[Robbie Barrett]

No. Never considered a writer would ask a secondary source for an interpretation of another's words. I figure he'd read or hear Eddie's words and make his own conclusions. The plain language of the Fights Hub video is pretty clear and doesn't really need interpretation

You're getting ridiculous now. So writers/interviewers never ask question based on what a rival has said? GTFOH

It doesn't need interpretation. I agree. It doesn't say what you said it does. Hearn even explained the offer, but you're still trying to push your BS. ****ing embarrassing man.

[Ray*]

So please tell me what does Eddie mean at the :30 second mark? What does "Whyte then Josh" mean?

The article was published in October. The Parker fight was not even agreed to at that point. You are lying if you say that Hearn meant Parker. Stop lying...

Those are his two fighters. Stop with your narratives. Wilder avoided Whyte plain and simple.