Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Hearn: 50-50 Deal is Now Possible For Joshua vs. Wilder or Fury

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
    Right here, what can I do for you champ?
    Joshua’s promoter is saying 50-50 is fair. This comes after you all said Wilder was ducking for not taking half of what he earned to fight Dominic Brezeale.

    Care to comment?

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by texasboi15 View Post
      He won that award already when he elected for peace rd 7 against Fat Andy

      And he's a shoe in for 2020 for the peace offering he made to Fury to help him train for Wilder

      FOH u friendly ass pussy
      This LDBC hoodrat got all emotional, lmao.

      I’m not emotionally invested in the split between Joshua vs. Wilder or Fury. Just seems like purely from an economic standpoint Joshua should get the biggest piece of the pie.

      Now dance for me, boy!

      Comment


      • #23
        After Wilder accepted 15 million flat to go to the UK and Hearn refused to do the fight next, Wilder said he would never consider the fight ever again until it was 50/50.

        So give Wilder credit for going out there, raising his profile, and making himself worth 50/50.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by OnlyBeingHonest View Post
          I remember when flat purses were offered and posters said they were ****** not to take it.
          You can still say they were considering what they were making at the time and what they’d be making now as undisputed.

          Comment


          • #25
            I agree with Hearn here l. Now that both fighters have raised their profiles I can definitely see the argument for 50/50 even though I don’t think it should be. Anything to get the fights done at this point

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by ShaneMosleySr View Post
              Joshua’s promoter is saying 50-50 is fair. This comes after you all said Wilder was ducking for not taking half of what he earned to fight Dominic Brezeale.

              Care to comment?
              You're gonna need to eleborate.

              Deyonce got what, 10-15mill (being generous) for staying with Showtime and fighting Breazeale instead of $20m on DAZN. He then got maybe the same money to fight Ortiz instead of potentially $40m + $40m for the AJ fights. Or he could have had another fight for $20m on DAZN before the AJ fights.

              Either way you look at it, Wilder is taking financial hits. If he was really betting on himself he would have fought a few of Wlad/AJ/Parker/Whyte/Haye/Martin to gain the titles and the financial clout to be the A side superstar in his own country and the world RIGHT NOW. That's what betting on yourself looks like, not this ducking **** he's doing right now rematching fighters.

              What's your point? That Deyonce is right to keep ducking and gamble on the value of the fight going up? Wtf kind of boxing fan are you when you would rather see fights marinate and the lure of undefeated v undefeated disappear?

              FWIW, Eddie is saying that Wilder or Fury MIGHT be worth that 50% in the case that AJ takes the financial hit to entice one of them into the ring. Of course, this depends on who emerges victorious from the trilogy, it probably won't even be Wilder.

              This also depends on what AJ does in his next two fights. If he KOs Pulev and Usyk, and the Saudis then want to throw $100m at him do you think he's gonna want to share that with Fury or Wilder if their trilogy bombs??

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by WBC WBA IBF View Post
                So give Wilder credit for going out there, raising his profile, and making himself worth 50/50.
                Which was the plan all along. He declined the offers to fight AJ to build his profile and try to get 50/50.

                And now we are here. He will probably decline the fights again at the end of the year unless he can get 60%.

                The fans lose at the end of the day, yet they cheer Deyonce on like it's their money rather than just wanting to see the fight.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Note to self. Stay away from these kind of threads for about 6 months at least after these guys fight other people as zero will happen until then.

                  Then after that 6 more months of bickering and maybe just maybe we will get this fight before 2022.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by jreckoning View Post
                    Note to self. Stay away from these kind of threads for about 6 months at least after these guys fight other people as zero will happen until then.

                    Then after that 6 more months of bickering and maybe just maybe we will get this fight before 2022.
                    Świnoujście

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by EnglishOxide View Post
                      You're gonna need to eleborate.

                      Deyonce got what, 10-15mill (being generous) for staying with Showtime and fighting Breazeale instead of $20m on DAZN. He then got maybe the same money to fight Ortiz instead of potentially $40m + $40m for the AJ fights. Or he could have had another fight for $20m on DAZN before the AJ fights.

                      Either way you look at it, Wilder is taking financial hits. If he was really betting on himself he would have fought a few of Wlad/AJ/Parker/Whyte/Haye/Martin to gain the titles and the financial clout to be the A side superstar in his own country and the world RIGHT NOW. That's what betting on yourself looks like, not this ducking **** he's doing right now rematching fighters.

                      What's your point? That Deyonce is right to keep ducking and gamble on the value of the fight going up? Wtf kind of boxing fan are you when you would rather see fights marinate and the lure of undefeated v undefeated disappear?

                      FWIW, Eddie is saying that Wilder or Fury MIGHT be worth that 50% in the case that AJ takes the financial hit to entice one of them into the ring. Of course, this depends on who emerges victorious from the trilogy, it probably won't even be Wilder.

                      This also depends on what AJ does in his next two fights. If he KOs Pulev and Usyk, and the Saudis then want to throw $100m at him do you think he's gonna want to share that with Fury or Wilder if their trilogy bombs??
                      No point, most of these guys didnt even bother reading the article...predictable.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP