Comments Thread For: Wilder vs. Fury Rematch To Be Followed By Trilogy

[SchoolTheseCats]

Why don't you try reading. Win or lose there's a rematch. It's a both way rematch clause.

I read and stated if wilder wins it’s no need to rush back in for a third fight with fury so soon why don’t you try reading instead of attempting to cherry pick as you usually do

[Richard]

Idk if fury can handle getting viciously KOd twice but I’m all for this trilogy. Can’t wait.

Iam not keen on it.I would prefer it that it should be who wins the next fight is the toughest and the best.A trilogy in my view waters this down.

[Toffee]

Making his already chosen opponent mandatory when he already has a mandatory. A mandatory challenger who keeps refusing their orders.

It doesn't matter who you think is better than who, or whether it's laughable that Wilder would duck Whyte... the fact remains that this is ridiculous. I thought even the WBC, with their franchise belts and schit must have some remnants of a competitive sport organisation left in them... turns out they don't.

[Robbie Barrett]

I read and stated if wilder wins it’s no need to rush back in for a third fight with fury so soon why don’t you try reading instead of attempting to cherry pick as you usually do

No need? It's confirmed...... FFS

[MDPopescu]

Wilder vs. Fury Rematch To Be Followed By Trilogy
Tyson Fury will fight Deontay Wilder twice next year. The former unified heavyweight champion made a sensational return to the ring back in June 2018, fighting twice before taking on the WBC champion at the Staples Center last December.
[Click Here To Read More]

...

... this definitely smells like a fix... which leads to suspecting that even the first one was a fix...

... well, OK, it's only about money and not about boxing...

... therefore, lost any kind of interest in this...

[LetOutTheCage]

Does that mean their planning to rob Fury again?

[juggernaut666]

Why are posters acting like Bob Arum didn’t do an interview about Fury being attached to a 3 fight contract ? He stated it would be a trilogy back in July and the winner of the second one would get the bigger share so Warren is not saying anything new here.

The Wilder vs Fury is not happening because of a hold up because of Joshua and mandatories it’s because Wilder signed a 3 fight deal with Fury in the beginning and could have fought AJ AGAIN When it was available after the Fury fight but he chose not to and probably wasn’t allowed to . Smh.

[Ray*]

Why are people pretending to be shocked? If you know your boxing then you know this WAS a done deal. Why did you think WBC made Fury the mandatory? Why did you think they place Whyte's mandatory in 2021 feb? They knew there is a trilogy for 2020 and a potential voluntary for the Fury/Wilder winner. It is a round robin that they want to do amongst each other.

This is why am saying Team Joshua should focus on their mandatories, if he doesn't get stripped on one of those belts, even if he gets stripped he can fight the winner of the beltholder later in the summer.

[Robbie Barrett]

Why are posters acting like Bob Arum didn’t do an interview about Fury being attached to a 3 fight contract ? He stated it would be a trilogy back in July and the winner of the second one would get the bigger share so Warren is not saying anything new here.

The Wilder vs Fury is not happening because of a hold up because of Joshua and mandatories it’s because Wilder signed a 3 fight deal with Fury in the beginning and could have fought AJ AGAIN When it was available after the Fury fight but he chose not to . Smh.

Why are people pretending to be shocked? If you know your boxing then you know this WAS a done deal. Why did you think WBC made Fury the mandatory? Why did you think they place Whyte's mandatory in 2021 feb? They knew there is a trilogy for 2020 and a potential voluntary for the Fury/Wilder winner. It is a round robin that they want to do amongst each other.

This is why am saying Team Joshua should focus on their mandatories, if he doesn't get stripped on one of those belts, even if he gets stripped he can fight the winner of the beltholder later in the summer.

If it was already confirmed why was Wilder/Ruiz talking about a unification fight next summer before Ruiz lost to Joshua?

[Ray*]

If it was already confirmed why was Wilder/Ruiz talking about a unification fight next summer before Ruiz lost to Joshua?

Wasn't that the reason Wilder was talking about Fury stepping aside and Fury threatening to sue? They have tied each other up, to booster their profile even more, it's all about joining forces to lessen Joshua's power and prevent him having loads of leverage over those two.