Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Crawford Explains Why He, Not Canelo, is The Top P4P Man

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Mr Bud is spot on. Kovalev was damaged goods - still a healthy challenge - but he's been on the slide since Ward II, imo.
    My Top 7 p4p: #1 Bud, #2 Loma, #3 Gingernut, #4 Inoue, #5 Ricky Burns, #6 Otto "All In" Wallin, #7 Rod Salka.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by kidbazooka View Post
      Facts.......
      I gotta go with Bull-shlt on this, sorry zooka.

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by Young Bidness View Post
        Crawford fans crying about Kovalev being 36... yet Crawford wants Pacquiao...

        LMAO. You can’t make this stuff up.
        So you think Kovelev is P4P equal to Manny? As if on the same level because he's 36? Seriously?

        Manny at 36 beat the Keith Thurman. Kovelev almost lost to a guy with no experience, doesn't spare and only had 12 amateur fights...total.

        Comment


        • #24
          zook. you sound foolish. Are you drunk?
          Originally posted by kidbazooka View Post
          This idiot just mentions Kova but even a 36 yr old Kova is waaaaaaaay better than anyone his dumbass has faced lol

          And he conveniently left out Jacobs who is also waaaaaaay better than anyone he’s faced lol

          Crawford needs to stfu cuz he’s making himself look dumber with every interview.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by Mister Wolf View Post
            You aint never heard me say that man. The best fight Canelo can take is Beterbiev followed by Callum Smith. It doesn't take a genius to understand why.
            I already said the best fight to make is Beterbiev. We agree Smith is a good fight too. I’m down for any of these. BJS been yappin and tweeting his horn far too long mentioning Canelo. Well now that BJS got the WBO and orgs like PBC don’t care for that belt, well then wouldn’t you agree the WBO make more sense in Canelo’s hands to then unify with Smith?

            Assume Canelo beats Smith then at least we can start a narrative mid 2020+ about Plant or Benavidez wanting time unify with a DAZN fighter . We already know the politics for this.

            I mean Canelo has great options for fans. I don’t see how anyone can hate why he’s P4P #1.

            Comment


            • #26
              If I were Bud, I would have eliminated Canelo from P4P discussions based on tainted taco meat.

              I don't believe anyone should be mentioned in the P4P discussions if they already been caught with banned substances in their blood.

              Comment


              • #27
                with his questionable decisions ped use lack of unification fights and loss no way alvarez should even be considered P4P #1 as for the crawfish i have never seen lomachenko mauled the way the crawfish was mauled in his fight with kavaliacus this past weekend lomachenko is the top boxer on the planet today nobody else even comes close

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by factsarenice View Post
                  So you think Kovelev is P4P equal to Manny? As if on the same level because he's 36? Seriously?

                  Manny at 36 beat the Keith Thurman. Kovelev almost lost to a guy with no experience, doesn't spare and only had 12 amateur fights...total.
                  ****** comparison dude. Lol

                  A better comparison would be Loma taking on Pacquiao at 147 if you want to be consistent with age, KO losses, and punching power.

                  Shape up your boxing knowledge bruh

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by SugarRaRobinson View Post
                    If I were Bud, I would have eliminated Canelo from P4P discussions based on tainted taco meat.
                    I think many of you didn’t do well in school.

                    How many boxing writers are challenging WADA’s revision for meat contamination thresholds? It’s a buried subject across all sports not just boxing. Lol

                    You think a typewriter and theory has more justification over multi-million dollar spectrometry machines and technicians with Medicine or Biochemistry degrees?

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by skinnystev View Post
                      with his questionable decisions ped use lack of unification fights and loss no way alvarez should even be considered P4P #1 as for the crawfish i have never seen lomachenko mauled the way the crawfish was mauled in his fight with kavaliacus this past weekend lomachenko is the top boxer on the planet today nobody else even comes close
                      How many boxing writers are challenging WADA’s revision for meat contamination thresholds? It’s a buried subject across all sports not just boxing. Lol

                      You think a typewriter and theory has more justification over multi-million dollar spectrometry machines and technicians with Medicine or Biochemistry degrees?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP