Ah yes, the great P4P discussion. A topic where everyone can be right and everyone can be wrong but we really can't prove any of it. I enjoy watching people get heated over P4P and mythical matchups.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Crawford Explains Why He, Not Canelo, is The Top P4P Man
Collapse
-
-
Was he thinking about floyd when he gave this statement?... floyd possibly beat 1 or 2 prime fighters in his career. The other 48 were cherry picked and boring fights. Canelo should be lb x lb king as of now. I did not like him but he has proved me wrong time and time again.
Comment
-
C'mon Bud. Please leave it alone? Pacquiao is 41, and if Bud beat him, it would be his BEST victory EVER! Horn was trash, Benavidez was shot (literally), and Khan has never been a champ @ 147!
Anyone who knows boxing knows that Crawford is the most complete fighter in the game right now, but Canelo has been tested, while Bud just wins the eye test! There's a simple way for Bud to win this argument. If it was so easy for Canelo to beat 36 year old Kovalev @ 175, then it should be easy for Bud to beat 37 year old GGG @ 160! Make It Happen!
Comment
-
Originally posted by PBR Streetgang View PostAh yes, the great P4P discussion. A topic where everyone can be right and everyone can be wrong but we really can't prove any of it. I enjoy watching people get heated over P4P and mythical matchups.
All of Thurman, Porter, Spencer, Danny, and even Manny are ducking the fight. Only so much Crawford can do to make a fight happen...and hes dominated everyone he's been in there with...that's all you can ask of a fighter
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bandman View PostCrawford competing with Khan now for most delusional boxer award. how is P4P #1 when he not even #1 at his division? drunk ass Spence is #1 until he loses in the ring.
Crawford was #1 at 135, unified and lineal and undisputed at 140, and has KOd EVERYONE hes fought at 147. The other top WWs wont fight Crawford. Hell Spence even drove his car into a ditch to avoid that fight..
Crawford or Manny (at 41 lmfao) are #1 WW. That's just what it is
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bronx2245 View PostC'mon Bud. Please leave it alone? Pacquiao is 41, and if Bud beat him, it would be his BEST victory EVER! Horn was trash, Benavidez was shot (literally), and Khan has never been a champ @ 147!
Anyone who knows boxing knows that Crawford is the most complete fighter in the game right now, but Canelo has been tested, while Bud just wins the eye test! There's a simple way for Bud to win this argument. If it was so easy for Canelo to beat 36 year old Kovalev @ 175, then it should be easy for Bud to beat 37 year old GGG @ 160! Make It Happen!
Comment
-
Originally posted by MexicanStyle#1 View PostWas he thinking about floyd when he gave this statement?... floyd possibly beat 1 or 2 prime fighters in his career. The other 48 were cherry picked and boring fights. Canelo should be lb x lb king as of now. I did not like him but he has proved me wrong time and time again.Last edited by doom_specialist; 12-17-2019, 08:47 AM.
Comment
-
Kovalev was old and worn when Canelo beat him. But he was still a legit champion and I do rank Canelo number 1 p4p for beating him. As great as a fighter that Crawford is, you cannot be pound for pound king when you haven’t even beat a top 5 guy in your own weight division.
Comment
Comment