Tweet
He made good points about Canelo. If you want to get a big win and be the light heavyweight champion, fight Beterbiev or Bivol, not a faded Kovalev, who surely should retire now. But Crawford has his flaws as well, a fantastic boxer, not that good a defence and chin.
-
-
Billy Joe Saunders just put up one of the stinkiest **** performances I have seen from a fighter considered good in recent memory. He was ****ing ashamed in the post fight interview. So lets stop ****ing around and playing dumb I know you're not ****** and fully understand why he was selected.Comment
-
Prime is different for different fighters.Not sure why its Charlo, Andrade lol, or why you think 8 years is nothing in boxing, because it most obviously is. I dont know where i said Canelo shoud have fought Kovalev years ago. But there are plenty of younger, more live guys for him in all divisions. No, i dont hes fought the young lions. Much of hes career at 154 was spent fighting older former welters and light middles. He fought Trout, hes best win there. Lara wasnt young on the way up, it was a debatable win, but yes, the Charlos and Andrade wouldve been the young lions when he was playing with Smith and khan. So hes goes up to middle and has two with Golovkin, who is aging whether you like it or not, the fights Jacobs, whos decent, but not a young lion, hes been stopped, been dropped, and hes a Golovkin victim.Fielding was domestic level. So we have a good 160, with Saunders, Andrade, Charlo, and a decent 168 with guys like Smith, Benavidez, 175 with Bivol, Beterbiev, and we get a finished Kovalev. So, despite the fact that he could well beat any and all of the young, undefeated guys, these aren't the best matches.Its avoiding the young, unbeaten men who are hungry, trying to make their name. You know, the guys champions down the ages fought to clean out divisions back when titles mattered.Comment
Comment