Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Crawford: Up To Me & Porter To Agree, Not Arum & Haymon

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by DumpkinsPlus5 View Post
    Anyone that thinks Porter beat Spence doesn't have a boxing eye, and shouldn't be taken seriously.
    Porter put up a good fight but he didn't win. Porter earned a moral victory and gained a little more respect from boxing fans, that's about it.

    Comment


    • #22
      Spence got the decision, but Porter won the fight.

      Comment


      • #23
        Let’s see it, great fight that the Porters already said they wanted. Not sure what the hemming and hawing is about? This is the way Crawford can Become the A-Side. If he dominates Porter he can become the man to beat at 147. I believe it’s a very winnable fight.

        In closing fight history revisionist please stop, although Porter was indeed very competitive there is no way he beat Spence. Can you score a fight or do you just count the punches that register for you emotionally?

        You guys have been doing this for decades. If you don’t like a guy a tight win is a clear loss and if you like a guy a tight loss is a clear robbery. No one believes you anymore. Get off your periods brothers.

        Comment


        • #24
          Originally posted by Boxing Hero View Post
          If Crawford can beat Porter, than I think he is better than Spence.

          I thought that Porter beat Spence in their fight and I wasn't giving Porter a shot.

          The judges beat Porter that night, not Spence.
          that is not how any sport works man...only way to see whom is better is for them to face each other

          Comment


          • #25
            Crawford is right!!!

            The fighters can make it happen no matter the network/ promoter BS.

            Comment


            • #26
              Shawn and Bud are friends, both have said on separate occasions that they would probably never fight and it would have to be something they both wanted to do for it to happen.

              Next...

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Death_Adder View Post
                Porter? Porter? Really?

                Porter has lost and loses to every top guy he's faced.

                Crawford is a joke
                Who else is he going to face from the PBC side of the street? Thurman and Spence don't wanna fight him, and DSG lost to Porter. Porter would be his best opponent at 147 by far.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Always thought manager had the right of refusal in their contracts with them so if Haymon didn't want it, it wouldn't happen.

                  I don't see why he wouldn't ok it though unless of course Pacquiao was on deck for Porter.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    OK...so no excuses not to make this fight with Spence Jr out WHY NOT!

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by sicko View Post
                      OK...so no excuses not to make this fight with Spence Jr out WHY NOT!
                      Porter is hoping for Pac. If he cant get Pac I'm sure his father will be in his ear asking him to take the Crawford fight. Kenny was the first one that starting putting the idea of them fighting out there right after he realized PBC and Spence wouldn't give his son an immediate rematch.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP