Evander Pedlyfield vs Oleksandr Usyk - who wins?
Collapse
-
-
I know you all are trolling but you guys are hilarious with these retarded ass hypotheticals. To compare a tried and true warrior, all-time great, HOF'er and legend who've been there and done that to an unproven and untested fighter is not only asinine but is also absolutely insane
Comment
-
People speak of Usyk as if he was some sort of revolutionary boxer 'From a technical perspective' from my observation he is a well schooled fighter in every area, with no great attributes. 'How does he evade punches? 80% of the time by using a simplistic high guard, he also seems to struggle to fight on the inside' Usyk has moved into the heavyweight division believing that his technical skills are that much superior to everyone else 'But in reality his technical skills are overrated, and physically as a athlete? He is not functioning in the same realm as reality as David Haye or Evander Holyfield.
When you are a cruiser-weight moving up into the heavyweight division, you need to have at-least once great asset 'To possibly negate the gap in dimensions'. David Haye had abnormal speed, athleticism and punching power. Evander Holyfield had incredible physical strength/durability, endurance and to top it off? He was a complete boxer.
Somebody show me the video footage of Usyk's great attributes? Show me the skills that make him far superior to these heavyweights? There is no video footage, because Usyk as a fighter has zero glaring great attributes 'He is just a well schooled solid fighter in every area'
Usyk does not really have much power, his speed of foot/hand is completely overrated and so is his defense 'And when he stops being so timid at heavyweight, all of what I have stated will be unearthed'Last edited by PRINCEKOOL; 12-16-2019, 07:50 PM.Comment
-
Comment

Comment