...I struggle to place Wilder above the other two. How can you justify that, considering divisional rankings are based on who you have beaten?
Yes, my rankings are:
1. Wilder
2. Fury
3. Joshua
I rank 'em this way because this is how I see future fights playing out. I think Wilder would eventually land a big right hand on Joshua, who wouldn't survive vertically.
And yep, I know that Fury and Joshua both defeated Klitschko. But Klit was an old man nearing the end.
As for Fury, I look forward to the fight. I feel he's on his way out, while Wilder is more likely to improve his boxing skills just enough to make a difference.
How can anyone have Wilder over Fury when everyone saw Fury beat him
Are we just in the age of ignoring robberies now?
Also Fury has better wins than AJ. He beat a younger and more dominant Wlad.
AJ’s best win is a Fury leftover that hadn’t fought in nearly 2 years and was in his 40s..
It’s true that Fury beat Wilder, but I don’t think the argument ends there. Tyson didn’t look impressive at all in his last outing, and he almost got KOed by Deontay. Wilder has KOed practically everyone he’s faced. In my view, there’s an argument for both these guys, and either could be number one.
I rank 'em this way because this is how I see future fights playing out. I think Wilder would eventually land a big right hand on Joshua, who wouldn't survive vertically.
And yep, I know that Fury and Joshua both defeated Klitschko. But Klit was an old man nearing the end.
As for Fury, I look forward to the fight. I feel he's on his way out, while Wilder is more likely to improve his boxing skills just enough to make a difference.
Ah ok, that’s fair enough
How would you rank them based on current resume? It’s a different criteria and I’m interested to see how this might change
Comment