Who has a better resume? Whyte vs Wilder

[Boksfan]

Whyte resume is much better, there is a reason why Wilder is ducking him.

[Phenom]

Actually Chisora should have had a W against Helenius. I watched that fight live, when you weren't even a boxing fan.

I never said Povetkin was better than Ortiz because he had a belt. I said he was because he's an Olympic champion, has 7 world champions on his resume, more than 10 top 10 wins and Ortiz has zero of any of that.

But that flew straight over your head.

I don't count anyone's losses or draws as wins on a resume.

Don't expect anything less from you

[LetOutTheCage]

If Chisora was gifted an opportunity to fight a tomato can like Chris Arreola for a vacant WBC title, does anybody really think the version of Chisora that Whyte fought twice, wouldn't absolutely obliterate Arreola?

Of course he would, it would be easy money for Chisora taking a belt and beat Arreola. But thats the sad thing about Stiverne, thats his best win against a guy who isnt and was never one of the top guys. the Version of Chisora that fought Whyte twice had already fought and beat better opposition than Stiverne.

[LacedUp]

Don't expect anything less from you

How would losing to Tyson Fury count in Wilder's favour?

this right here is when you know you're dealing with a fanboy. Instead of debating boxing, they just attack you personally.

... because that's all they got.

[BM dnobagaV]

Whyte has a better resume than Wilder or Fury.

[KillaMane26]

Why didnt u list Breazele?

[deathofaclown]

If you’re talking wins and not gift draws, then Whyte probably. But there’s not much in it.

Let’s be honest, a lot of fighters might’ve become world champ if they had Wilders route to a title, or AJ’s route for that matter when he got Charles Martin.

I’ve no doubt that someone like Chisora or Whyte would’ve been world champ if they got title fights with Charles Martin or Stiverne.

[deathofaclown]

Whyte has a better resume than Wilder or Fury.

How?

Fury beat Wlad who was unbeaten in a decade.

Beat Chisora twice in much easier fashion than Whyte, and that was a Chisora that was undefeated the first time, and the second time he’d only been beaten by guys like Vitali and Haye. Whyte went life and death a faded Chisora that’d had about 8 losses, 2 of them to Fury. I actually think Chisora beat Whyte the first time.

Fury also really beat Wilder.

Don’t talk nonsense. Fury’s resume isn’t great in terms of depth, but he’s beaten the best guys at the time such as Wlad and Wilder, and made easy work of guys like Chisora.

[bluebeam]

Legitimate question here. They both have some good wins, neither have any top wins.

Let's see how they stack up!

Wilder

• Stiverne
• Luiz Orti
• Duhaupas
• Szpilka
• Washington

Whyte

• Dereck Chisora
• Joseph Parker
• Robert Helenius
• Oscar Rivas
• Lucas Browne

What do you thin? Looks pretty close to me, with Chisora and Stiverne being same level, and Parker and Ortiz being the same level.

Wilder has more fights and therefore might just edge it, but otherwise it's really a pick'em situation.

Ortiz is better than everybody on whyte resume including whyte.

[Ray*]

Ortiz is better than everybody on whyte resume including whyte.

Nope Parker is actually better than Ortiz, and he has proven it in the ring.