Comments Thread For: Dillian Whyte vs. Mariusz Wach Added To Joshua-Ruiz Card

[Phenom]

Hahaha hahaha, I have so much baby excuses here.
You probably have 1001 excuses why wilder shouldn't fight whyte but you ad live him to fight that man with HBP again.
That explain it all.
What a group of weaklings.

Whyte is not important enough to duck guy goes 12 with Robert Helenius and he supposed to be a threat


Look Whyte probably looks good to you in comparison because you watch guys like Tom Little and David Price on sky but let's be real here he could possibly lose to this bum he is fighting in Saudi Arabia

Levels mate...

[4truth]

Ortiz was good enough to make Whyte swerve, so there’s that anyway.

I’d like to see Whyte fight Ortiz or rematch Parker. Wilder has enough on his plate right now.

Instead Whyte is going to tee off on 39 year old Wach. Wach is 2-3 over the last 2 years. His victories almost meaningless, against fighters with a combined record of 8-35.

[uppercut510]

Whereas you just jump on the bandwagon and condemn an innocent man because if you've heard "PEDs" mentioned enough times it must be true?

man that dude is guilty and they are sweeping under the rug in front of your face, either way something is fishy

[Laligalaliga]

Whyte is not important enough to duck guy goes 12 with Robert Helenius and he supposed to be a threat


Look Whyte probably looks good to you in comparison because you watch guys like Tom Little and David Price on sky but let's be real here he could possibly lose to this bum he is fighting in Saudi Arabia

Levels mate...

Lol.....therefore wilder should keep off.
Be man enough to say it in clear terms.
Stop doing hide and seek.
You would prefer wilder to fight Ortiz again.
Lol......

[Laligalaliga]

Ortiz was good enough to make Whyte swerve, so there’s that anyway.

I’d like to see Whyte fight Ortiz or rematch Parker. Wilder has enough on his plate right now.

Instead Whyte is going to tee off on 39 year old Wach. Wach is 2-3 over the last 2 years. His victories almost meaningless, against fighters with a combined record of 8-35.

These wilderites are unbelievable.....Ortiz probably has the worst resume in top 10 HW with non or one meaningful victory.
He's definitely the Kong-Kong.
Lmao

[4truth]

These wilderites are unbelievable.....Ortiz probably has the worst resume in top 10 HW with non or one meaningful victory.
He's definitely the Kong-Kong.
Lmao

He’d have better resume if fighters like Whyte were not avoiding him.

[Laligalaliga]

He’d have better resume if fighters like Whyte were not avoiding him.

Let's assume whyte avoided him.....what happens to other guys like breazeale, parker, potvetkin, chisora, Rivas, spilka, konawski, and so many?
Did they all avoid him too?
Lmao

[deathofaclown]

That's exactly what happened with the Furys (Hughie and Tyson).

Who has Hearn had a go at? fighters who has been in the same position? Miller? Fury? Ryan Martin? Canelo?

Tyson Fury was stripped of his license from the BBBoC and banned, so the same thing never happened as Whyte.

The problem with the Fury case, which i think also happened with Eric Molina, is that UKAD never acknowledge their failed tests until at least a year after the tests, which is a huge problem. Because it means fighters had failed tests but nobody knew and carried on fighting.

Whyte’s case is different. He failed a test, no statements about why he failed or what he took. Everything goes dark, no ban, no information about anything, then he’s suddenly fighting again.

So the cases are not comparable, neither is in the right of course. But you’re saying Hearn wouldn’t be demanding answers if Andy Ruiz failed a test, then everything seems to go quiet and then he’s fighting a few months later with no information about anything that happened?

[REDEEMER]

Whyte is not important enough to duck guy goes 12 with Robert Helenius and he supposed to be a threat


Look Whyte probably looks good to you in comparison because you watch guys like Tom Little and David Price on sky but let's be real here he could possibly lose to this bum he is fighting in Saudi Arabia

Levels mate...

You can't talk about levels when Ortiz reputation on his best win was 4 years ago. Whyte is much more proven then Ortiz. It also doesn't help Ortiz declined a July 28th O2 arena fight that Parker took but fought on that same day in the states. It shows Ortiz ducked another fight offered to him .

[Ray*]

Tyson Fury was stripped of his license from the BBBoC and banned, so the same thing never happened as Whyte.

The problem with the Fury case, which i think also happened with Eric Molina, is that UKAD never acknowledge their failed tests until at least a year after the tests, which is a huge problem. Because it means fighters had failed tests but nobody knew and carried on fighting.

Whyte’s case is different. He failed a test, no statements about why he failed or what he took. Everything goes dark, no ban, no information about anything, then he’s suddenly fighting again.

So the cases are not comparable, neither is in the right of course. But you’re saying Hearn wouldn’t be demanding answers if Andy Ruiz failed a test, then everything seems to go quiet and then he’s fighting a few months later with no information about anything that happened?

Firstly am asking not assuming, Hearn talking non sense is an assumption from you. Fact is as much rubbish as Hearn talks he has only spoken about fighters that failed a drug test in fights he or his fighters have been involved.

I don’t think I heard him speaking about Tyson Fury’s issues when it was ongoing but I could be wrong. You assuming here without any facts to back that up.

Secondly Fury’s cases IS comparable to Whyte, still till this day you have some who try to pretend like Fury didn’t fail a drug test. He just had enough money and threat to be able to get UKAD off his back. That doesn’t mean he isn’t guilty in my book.

Whyte is in the same boat as Fury, the UKAD processes is one where they have to be absolutely certain or they would be sued like Fury did with them and nearly bankrupt them, Tyson Fury fought as a dirty fighter against Hammer, Just like it would be proven that Whyte fought as a dirty fighter against Rivas by UKAD.

We can’t try and sugarcoat it here because it’s Tyson Fury, with him a lot more was buried underneath the surface so as to not tarnish his reputation.

Fact is until UKAD comes out with their findings then they cannot prevent Whyte from earning a living. If Whyte’s defence was “I pass VADA” then he can turn around and accuse UKAD of contaminating one of his samples..... The leeway for boxers to get away with cheating is there.

Tyson Fury failed a drug test against Hammer and was allowed to go on and fight Wladimir. So yeah they are definitely comparable here.