Comments Thread For: Team Ryder To Meet With Hearn, Write To WBA Over Scores

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Shadoww702
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Sep 2015
    • 41176
    • 4,546
    • 2,938
    • 250,035

    #11
    Originally posted by Sparked_26
    Good on them.

    At the end of the day they should it’s a robbery because they’ve literally robbed John and his family unless he is given a rematch.

    I just don’t get what judges see.

    I really think they only way to make it fair is if you have judges who genuinely don’t know who the f.uck either fighter is.

    Let’s say Ryder was called Canelo and that fight plays out the same.

    It’s an easy 117-111 across the board
    Judges be seeing $$$$

    Comment

    • Sparked_26
      Undisputed Champion
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jul 2012
      • 15584
      • 980
      • 133
      • 93,128

      #12
      Originally posted by Shadoww702
      Judges be seeing $$$$
      I don’t know about that but I think if you go into the fight with any narrative that affects the judges then it’s game over.

      This one was about Smith looking good in front of his own fans and putting himself in the shop window for Canelo.

      I dunno how they rectify this problem. We’d have to be keeping judges in a shed for 10 years and wheeling them out for fights

      Comment

      • SteveM
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2015
        • 8286
        • 2,295
        • 1,211
        • 35,733

        #13
        Originally posted by Mammoth
        Why would anybody want to see Canelo fight Smith after that fight?
        Ermmm, did anyone want to see Canelo-Fielding? Still happened.
        It's a legacy fight doe.

        Comment

        • SteveM
          Undisputed Champion
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Feb 2015
          • 8286
          • 2,295
          • 1,211
          • 35,733

          #14
          Originally posted by Shadoww702
          Judges be seeing $$$$
          It's sooo easy to have judges in your pocket, refs too. So easy to set up off-shore bank accounts in the name of a judge's family member. Loose diamonds - worth $5,000 - $100,000 (or much more) - on sale online, so small, so easy to carry.

          But even if it isn't that, even if it's judges being told that "There's a lot of money riding on a Canelo-Smith fight down the line and he can't lose, DO YOU UNDERSTAND?"------------ even if it's just that, that the implication is your judging work with fights and money and hotels and expense accounts is all up in the air if you get this wrong - then it's just plain wrong.

          Comment

          • Mammoth
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Sep 2016
            • 35678
            • 3,831
            • 3,378
            • 378,304

            #15
            Originally posted by SteveM
            Ermmm, did anyone want to see Canelo-Fielding? Still happened.
            It's a legacy fight doe.
            Was Fielding coming off a controversial win? No....

            Comment

            • SteveM
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Feb 2015
              • 8286
              • 2,295
              • 1,211
              • 35,733

              #16
              Nobody wanted to see the Fielding fight - even Canelo fans didn't.

              Comment

              • Corelone
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2009
                • 13316
                • 1,782
                • 849
                • 66,332

                #17
                Ryder complaining to Hearn is like asking a snake why he bit you.

                Comment

                • Del Boy 999
                  Amateur
                  Interim Champion - 1-100 posts
                  • Apr 2019
                  • 11
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  • 1,593

                  #18
                  Terry o Conner again! 117 - 111???
                  Did the same to Hughes v Davies jnr.
                  Don't matter who actually won. All about the next big promotion!

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP