Both ggg and canelo knock smith the **** out

[aboutfkntime]

I don't stalk you like you do me so I don't have access to that quote.

Do you ever score fights?

I don't talk to dishonest shltheads

and I don't talk to shltheads who keep me on ignore until they need to ask me a silly question, in order to change the subject, after I have embarrassed them

don't ever expect to be taken seriously, if you cannot be honest

I have access to your quotes, and I always include links

you LIED about the context... you dishonest piece-of-shlt

THAT... is why you did not include a link

THAT... is why there is no... " he really said that: "... comment lol

prior to the second quote in your sig... why did you feel the need to say "he really said that"?... you lying piece-of-shlt?

dude, chill... you got BAAAAADLY owned for weeks... I get it LMAO

#desperate
#scrapingthebottomofthebarrel
#clutchingatstrawslmao

[Boxing_1013]

I don't talk to dishonest shltheads

and I don't talk to shltheads who keep me on ignore until they need to ask me a silly question, in order to change the subject, after I have embarrassed them

don't ever expect to be taken seriously, if you cannot be honest

I have access to your quotes, and I always include links

Just having some fun with ya man...no hard feelings....would be interested to see your cards in some of these fights though

[Larry the boss]

I think Abel said that...but yeah Hagler or his team I'm sure made a similar comment over the course of his career

Also I mean come on man..all of the fights at 168 that really made sense for GGG never materialized, because he was too high risk at that time...Froch and Chavez Jr...don't even want to get into the Ward stuff...that fight was never really going to happen.

GGG staying at 160 and waiting on Canelo just made sense for GGG...or waiting for Cotto etc

No, GGG said that himself

[aboutfkntime]

Just having some fun with ya man...no hard feelings....would be interested to see your cards in some of these fights though

yea, me too... have a great day man




thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....

I just made a thread about specifically why people rate Canelo's resume as better than GGG's...and I laid out my case as to why I rate GGG's better.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=820918

----------------------------

thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one

I don't think Canelo would have gotten all of his guys out by KO and maybe would not have 'won' all of them.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...820918&page=10

----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....

never had a slip up against quality opposition, and he faced probably more of them than almost any other fighter in history...

https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=824905

----------------------------

thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda

I just never really saw the skills from him..... if he was born in a different country I don't think he would have been looked at much differently than Bika Barrera or Miranda etc.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...2#post19903762

----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins

Yeah he has about 10+ good wins imo...and 5-6 'great' wins if you want to term it that...great fighter, great career...an ATG at MW...that's pretty clear I think..... If a great win is a dominant win over another prime great fighter...I would say GGG has quite a few tbh.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...821123&page=20

----------------------------

thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs

Lemieux, Murray pretty clearly around the level of SD Canelo Jacobs...
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...9#post20112309

----------------------------

thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....

Canelo's top wins would be Lara..Jacobs and Cotto imo...GGG's would be Jacobs, Murray and Lemieux...I don't see a ton of separation there..... winning 7-5 vs a great Lara...and going 12 with a shot fat Cotto...is not imo better than 8 Round destruction of Lemieux...and 11 round destruction of Murray..... Vanes was inactive and moving up in weight...but he wasn't shot like SSM more or less was..... I don't think going 12 with Mosley when Canelo did, or 12 with Trout, are better wins than GGG running through Monroe and Geale.....
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...820918&page=16

----------------------------

creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....

Boxing1013 attempted to remove defence, ring generalship, and effective aggression, as official scoring criteria..... to justify why he thinks Golovkin beat Canelo in their rematch..... but, had NO IDEA that Steve Weisfeld was AN OFFICIAL JUDGE at the Canelo/Golovkin rematch..... and Weisfeld scored that fight for Canelo looool
https://www.boxingscene.com/forums/s...d.php?t=818903

-------------------------------

[Larry the boss]

I mean...a wise man changes his mind when presented with new evidence...what is wrong with that

A "WISE MAN" would know not to flap his mouth so soon..otherwise they end up looking like a fool

[Larry the boss]

Dead on, Mr Historian.
Callum Smith"s fought at LHW a handful of times but he's settled in at SMW.
But thanks for bringing that piece in.

Just saying dont slam the guy who is moving up and down in weight and leave out the guy sitting at 1 weight and not really doing anything worth mentioning outside of Canelo and Jacobs

[Boxing_1013]

No, GGG said that himself

Come on man you're reaching...the dude is asked a question about fighting certain guys or up to a certain weight...in the first video, he says 'yeah I'd fight those guys' lol...I mean how is that any different than what happens with every other fighter...the circumstances still have to makes sense for those fights to happen, for any fighter.

The 2nd video...he seems to be saying that for the right fight...he would go to 154 (probably for Manny lol) or go up to 175...again the circumstances would have to be right for those fights/weights to make sense...come on man you just look like you're hating here, you're better than that.

[Boxing_1013]

A "WISE MAN" would know not to flap his mouth so soon..otherwise they end up looking like a fool

Lol...I can only speak for myself...but I would have favored Smith before tonight...now I wouldn't...that's just what we do as fans/followers of the sport...we are analyzing fights and fighters and giving our views.

Not sure if you don't form your own opinions or something...maybe you just watch Dontae's BN and parrot whatever he says, idk.

But yeah it's perfectly normal to judge a fighter one way...then after a fight or two, you could have a new opinion of him...come on man I'm sure you've done the same there.

Just saying dont slam the guy who is moving up and down in weight and leave out the guy sitting at 1 weight and not really doing anything worth mentioning outside of Canelo and Jacobs

Again the point though is that Canelo (as the A-side in all of boxing) has many more opportunities to PICK fights that make sense for him...he can pick on Fielding at 168 and put a weight clause on him...and pick Kovalev on short notice for Kov after a hard fight, and when Kov is already looking a bit shot.

It is also a lot easier for Canelo to even take some fights because if he ever goes 12 rounds he knows he is getting the nod.

To hype up Fielding/Kov and not give GGG credit for facing a real MW like Derevychenko...I mean you lose credibility there man...come on bro just keep it real a bit...we can all have our favorites but let's at least try and keep it real on most of this stuff.

[Boxing_1013]

yea, me too... have a great day man




thinks that Golovkin has a better resume than Canelo.....


----------------------------

thinks that one of the " killers " on Golovkin's resume could have beaten Canelo.... but will not say which one


----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has faced more quality opposition than almost any other fighter in history.....


----------------------------

thinks that Andre Ward is no better than Bika Barrera and Miranda


----------------------------

thinks that Golovkin has 5-6 'great' wins..... but cannot even name 1 of those 'great' wins


----------------------------

thinks that Lemieux, Murray... are the same level as Canelo/Jacobs



----------------------------

thinks that Murray Lemieux Monroe and Vanes, are better wins for Golovkin..... than Lara Cotto Trout and Mosley, are for Canelo.....


----------------------------

creates a thread misquoting Steve Weisfeld.....


-------------------------------

Btw...you're misrepresenting me in a few of those quotes...that's partially why I give ya a hard time...but it's all good...but yeah a lot of those other posts from me are just how I see it...I don't really see how the other side of that argument in those debates can really hype up their side at all...just don't see it...then again I am just an unbiased guy, and have no real dog in all those fights...so I guess some will get offended when you go after 'their guys'

[satiev1]

Yea, but Froch was what..37 then??? Smith is only 29..remember he wanted Ward to come down to 164..so im not sure Smith "sucks enough"

He just lost to a guy who got lost to fielding and got koed by blackwell. STOP IT.