Which win is more impressive, in Pac/Thurman or Canelo/Kovalev

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FredRekk
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Aug 2019
    • 1513
    • 49
    • 0
    • 45,022

    #21
    Originally posted by aboutfkntime
    who did he knock out ?
    Yo Mama!!!

    Comment

    • boliodogs
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • May 2008
      • 33358
      • 824
      • 1,782
      • 309,589

      #22
      Pac by a mile to me. Thurman fought his heart out. Kovalev never threw a hard punch the whole fight that I saw and did not fight like a guy who was trying to win the fight in my opinion.

      Comment

      • John Locke
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Sep 2013
        • 7818
        • 411
        • 287
        • 40,060

        #23
        Any version of Thurman is better than any version of Kovalev. And the Canelo that fought Kova is in his prime, whereas Pacman isn't. No doubt which is the better win. Not even debatable really.

        Comment

        • Joe Beamish
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Aug 2014
          • 3475
          • 157
          • 42
          • 30,582

          #24
          Originally posted by Htown-Finest
          Pac Thurman super easy
          Yup. Kovalev has been getting knocked out for half of his fights for awhile now. He’s done, basically. Ward ended him. Not a real fight. Just a cherry pick for the A side Canelo.

          Canelo looked good, don’t get me wrong. But Pac/Thurman was a real matchup. And Thurman DIDN’T quit.

          Comment

          • aboutfkntime
            Undisputed Champion
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Feb 2015
            • 47370
            • 1,631
            • 3,563
            • 391,308

            #25
            Originally posted by John Locke
            Any version of Thurman is better than any version of Kovalev. And the Canelo that fought Kova is in his prime, whereas Pacman isn't. No doubt which is the better win. Not even debatable really.




            oh wtf... ?

            LMAO

            FACT: Kovalev was a killer
            FACT: Thurman was not a killer

            wtf... ?

            Kovalev > Thurman... NOT EVEN CLOSE

            the only question is, how much did Kovalev have left... and the SAME question hung over Thurman, who has never looked the same since returning from inactivity

            add to that, Canelo jumped TWO divisions and he knocked Kovalev out

            the only other question is Manny's performance at 40yo

            a number of 40yo's (or close) have beaten better fighters than Thurman... but very few people have jumped two divisions and knocked out Kovalev

            Comment

            • John Locke
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Sep 2013
              • 7818
              • 411
              • 287
              • 40,060

              #26
              Originally posted by aboutfkntime
              oh wtf... ?

              LMAO

              FACT: Kovalev was a killer
              FACT: Thurman was not a killer

              wtf... ?

              Kovalev > Thurman... NOT EVEN CLOSE

              the only question is, how much did Kovalev have left... and the SAME question hung over Thurman, who has never looked the same since returning from inactivity

              add to that, Canelo jumped TWO divisions and he knocked Kovalev out

              the only other question is Manny's performance at 40yo

              a number of 40yo's (or close) have beaten better fighters than Thurman... but very few people have jumped two divisions and knocked out Kovalev
              LOL! A killer of what? C level opposition? Same way Thurman was a 'killer' when he was fighting lower level competition. It really isn't even close, Thurman is more skilled, has a much better resume and isn't a mental midget like Kovalev.

              Who is Kovalev's best win? BHop's corpse? Pascal who even at his best was a B level guy. Has Kovalev beaten anyone even close to the level of a Garcia or Porter?

              Thurman didn't look much different than usual against Lopez, he was a little less sharper but you get rid of that with rounds. Thurman has been hurt in a lot of fights, to take away from Pac's credit people just saying he didn't look the same but don't want to explain how he didn't look the same.

              Kovalev has been getting sparked out since the amateur days, he was a good fighter a few years back but nothing more. Look at his resume. He barely beat Chilema (who is a good fighter) in his prime...

              Comment

              • HeadShots
                Undisputed Champion
                Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                • Sep 2016
                • 10036
                • 1,933
                • 129
                • 72,763

                #27
                Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                oh wtf... ?

                LMAO

                FACT: Kovalev was a killer
                FACT: Thurman was not a killer

                wtf... ?

                Kovalev > Thurman... NOT EVEN CLOSE

                the only question is, how much did Kovalev have left... and the SAME question hung over Thurman, who has never looked the same since returning from inactivity

                add to that, Canelo jumped TWO divisions and he knocked Kovalev out

                the only other question is Manny's performance at 40yo

                a number of 40yo's (or close) have beaten better fighters than Thurman... but very few people have jumped two divisions and knocked out Kovalev



                A killer getting KOed by a pillow fisted 168er and a pillow fisted 175er. JFL has Thurman been KOed yet?






                Comment

                • aboutfkntime
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 47370
                  • 1,631
                  • 3,563
                  • 391,308

                  #28
                  Originally posted by John Locke
                  LOL! A killer of what? C level opposition? Same way Thurman was a 'killer' when he was fighting lower level competition. It really isn't even close, Thurman is more skilled, has a much better resume and isn't a mental midget like Kovalev.

                  Who is Kovalev's best win? BHop's corpse? Pascal who even at his best was a B level guy. Has Kovalev beaten anyone even close to the level of a Garcia or Porter?

                  Thurman didn't look much different than usual against Lopez, he was a little less sharper but you get rid of that with rounds. Thurman has been hurt in a lot of fights, to take away from Pac's credit people just saying he didn't look the same but don't want to explain how he didn't look the same.

                  Kovalev has been getting sparked out since the amateur days, he was a good fighter a few years back but nothing more. Look at his resume. He barely beat Chilema (who is a good fighter) in his prime...



                  Thurman barely beat Porter... and that is likely his best win

                  hell, he barely beat Danny Garcia lol

                  Kovalev arguably beat Andre fkn Ward

                  Kovalev was a killer... Thurman is a never-was

                  I was never sold on Thurman... he is not the same level fighter as Spence/Crawford, etc... not even sure he would beat Horn at this point

                  Comment

                  • John Locke
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Sep 2013
                    • 7818
                    • 411
                    • 287
                    • 40,060

                    #29
                    Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                    Thurman barely beat Porter... and that is likely his best win

                    hell, he barely beat Danny Garcia lol

                    Kovalev arguably beat Andre fkn Ward

                    Kovalev was a killer... Thurman is a never-was

                    I was never sold on Thurman... he is not the same level fighter as Spence/Crawford, etc... not even sure he would beat Horn at this point
                    Okay now I think you're trolling...

                    Shawn Porter is a better fighter than Kovalev, so is Danny Garcia. They have better resumes, this isn't an opinion. 'Barely' beating them is still beating them.

                    Kovalev's best win is indeed a loss to Ward. Some 'killer'. Keith and Spence look about the same level to me, they have different skills and traits but didn't Spence also 'barely' beat Porter?

                    Anyway, you didn't directly address my points. Who has Kovalev beaten anywhere near Porter or Garcia's level? Sure he's a killer when he's fighting low level comp and 50 year olds...

                    Comment

                    • daggum
                      All time great
                      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 43699
                      • 4,657
                      • 3
                      • 166,270

                      #30
                      Originally posted by aboutfkntime
                      Thurman barely beat Porter... and that is likely his best win

                      hell, he barely beat Danny Garcia lol

                      Kovalev arguably beat Andre fkn Ward

                      Kovalev was a killer... Thurman is a never-was

                      I was never sold on Thurman... he is not the same level fighter as Spence/Crawford, etc... not even sure he would beat Horn at this point
                      was is the key word here

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP