Donaires was a pfp fighter not long ago. So first real test. Yes
Nonito Donaire was Inoue's first real test
Collapse
-
-
It was Inoue who moved up for the fight, not other way around. Not sure what the point is of restating that he was 39. Yes, he was. And Inoue was 21, moving up to a new weight, in less than 10 fights. You're crazy if you think Narvaez was soft opposition. By that definition, every single P4P fighter right now has fought soft opposition.
Donaire was 36. He's not ancient. Hell, 36 year old Golovkin gave Canelo all he could handle. 36 year old Floyd outboxed Canelo.Comment
-
- -200+ lb Bayliss was riding Canelo's back just as he does all TUE 50-0 opponent.
See Laurence Cole on Loma vs Salido how that goes.
Did U cream over the Banty debutante Tenshin KO too?
Yeah, thats U!!!Comment
-
Yeah I mean he fought some OK fighters up to that point, for where he was in his career. But no one with Donaire's caliber. Even if he is just a gatekeeper at this point.Comment
-
Donaire has taken way more punishment then GGG, you can't compared the two (GGG has never been knocked down let alone KOed while Donaire has been flat lined.) GGG is also just more durable.getting tired of ppl saying a 36 yr old donaire was 'way past his prime', and would have done this and that if he was younger.. inoue won that fight without any question vs a 20lb heavier rehydrated donaire. is it not possible, that inoue is also growing into his prime.
the same 36 yr old golovkin (arguable first dec loss to canelo) and kovalev are also the same age, which by that ****** logic makes canelo nothing impressive. and lomachenko, who's best win is vs a 37 yr old rigondeaux who was also 2 wgt classes lighter.
donaire has a better resume than all those guys at bantam, and is same age or younger.
and pfp top dogs all have the same argument. on the exception of crawford who hasn't fought anyone with a resume.Comment
-
Comment
-
NO
donaire is known as one of the most durable fighters in the game, if that fight didn't prove that, you must blind. GGG never fought 2-3 wgt classes above. donaire got a superior resume to GGG, and just flat out better.
the amount of bias on this forum is ridiculous. the same people who claim canelo's greatness vs 37 yr old fighters, say the opposite for inoue.Comment
-
let's not forgot a 40 yr old pacquiao beat thurman not too long ago.
which would make thuman, porter, garcia, bradley, nothing special according to that logic.
and let's no forget, mayweathers biggest win of his career was vs a 36 yr old pacquiao (who's been Koed 3x)
think about it, mayweather did his best work when he was 35-37..Comment
-
How many times Donaire been KOed and how many times has GGG been Knocked out? I rest my case.NO
donaire is known as one of the most durable fighters in the game, if that fight didn't prove that, you must blind. GGG never fought 2-3 wgt classes above. donaire got a superior resume to GGG, and just flat out better.
the amount of bias on this forum is ridiculous. the same people who claim canelo's greatness vs 37 yr old fighters, say the opposite for inoue.
The only person blind here is you.Comment
-
Exactly , this dude cant tell which way is up. Donaire was a featherwieght at one time against a guy who was untill recently a Junoir Bantamweight. Common on Man!It was Inoue who moved up for the fight, not other way around. Not sure what the point is of restating that he was 39. Yes, he was. And Inoue was 21, moving up to a new weight, in less than 10 fights. You're crazy if you think Narvaez was soft opposition. By that definition, every single P4P fighter right now has fought soft opposition.
Donaire was 36. He's not ancient. Hell, 36 year old Golovkin gave Canelo all he could handle. 36 year old Floyd outboxed Canelo.Comment
Comment