Why can’t we acknowledge that there’s an argument for multiple fighters to be #1 p4p?

[Boxing_1013]

Pfp is all subjective man...some of us are rather neutral with it...and about half of us have slight or extreme bias with it...just how it is...you could make a case for a number of guys in a way.

[Boxing_1013]

Six guys have rightfull claims.

Alvarez, Spence, Lomachenko, Crawford, Inoue, and Usyk.

Order the six however you prefer, any knowledgeable fan knows that that's the cream, full stop.

Eh...I mean I saw Canelo, very recently, lose to GGG twice...and I saw Spence struggle with Porter much more than expected...and even his win vs Mikey was rather unimpressive to me...natural comparison was Brook's fight vs GGG there.

Basically just saying that for one's personal pfp...it depends on how you view what those guys have done...not what the official record or general consensus is.

I don't really follow Inoue so can't rate him...think Usyk would be behind Canelo, Loma, and Crawford right now...and GGG too, as I feel he is aging even though I had him with 2 Ws over Canelo...the Spence one, mandating that he is top 6 there, is just a strange one to me.

And I have always been high on him...just can't really get there for him, certainly not over a GGG...even though Spence (hopefully) is still rising and GGG is on the way out surely.

[ShaneMosleySr]

Elieder Alvarez is a top dog? LOL

Why is Jacobs excuses for a loss to Quillan if Linares isn’t excused for his losses? That was before his fight with Canelo.

Why is Cotto excused for losing so badly to Trout if Linares isn’t excused for his losses? That was before his loss to Canelo and he lost almost every round.

Linares hadn’t lost for six years prior to Lomachenko and I’m not the only one who believes he was better than all those guys. He was ranked higher on p4p lists everywhere than those guys.

Salido is a three time featherweight champion who beat Lomachenko in his second pro fight.

Donaire won at most four rounds in that fight. It was nowhere near as competitive as about six fights in Canelo’s career. And why is Donaire an example of someone who’s not that good if Cotto and Jacobs being held up as an example of a great fighter? Rigodeaux and Frampton didn’t beat him as badly as Trout beat Cotto or as badly as Quillan beat Jacobs.

Kovalev lost to top dogs Linares got beat by mediocre opponents! And you really think Linares is better than Jacobs, Kovalev or Cotto? And the difficulties Lara, Golovkin and Trout are having are after canelo fought them! What I said about Salido and Linares are before their fights with Lomachenko you really can't tell the difference?... And Donaire did give Inoue all he could handle he had him wobbly and holding on and reports say he broke Inoue's orbital and nose! A well past it Donaire did that. It is what it is man not what you wish was.

[dukesville]

Elieder Alvarez is a top dog? LOL

Why is Jacobs excuses for a loss to Quillan if Linares isn’t excused for his losses? That was before his fight with Canelo.

Why is Cotto excused for losing so badly to Trout if Linares isn’t excused for his losses? That was before his loss to Canelo and he lost almost every round.

Linares hadn’t lost for six years prior to Lomachenko and I’m not the only one who believes he was better than all those guys. He was ranked higher on p4p lists everywhere than those guys.

Salido is a three time featherweight champion who beat Lomachenko in his second pro fight.

Donaire won at most four rounds in that fight. It was nowhere near as competitive as about six fights in Canelo’s career. And why is Donaire an example of someone who’s not that good if Cotto and Jacobs being held up as an example of a great fighter? Rigodeaux and Frampton didn’t beat him as badly as Trout beat Cotto or as badly as Quillan beat Jacobs.

Your a fool man you don't even know what you're talking about its funny. Jacobs fought a very close fight with ggg and canelo two top middleweights he beat Quillin and he beat Derevyanchenko. Trout is way better than Salgado a low tear guy that koed Linares in his prime in round 1! He is better than Terrazas and maybe even better than De Marco. It dosen't matter if you want to pretend they didn't happened because they did just like Donaire gave as good as he got thats why both him and Inoue were busted up. And thats your problem...you deny stuff that happened and make up stuff that didn't happen or that hasn't been said.