WTF: How is Whyte fighting in Saudi Arabia next month?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Again I do think that allowing a fighter to fight with uninspected glovess [with a BS excuse] presents a grave danger to the life of the opponent.
And the boxer, trainer or whoever were party to that should be permabanned.Comment
-
Keep waiting for the B Sample then. Not sure who told you anything is happening with it. Swept under the carpet... by being called to a hearing with the Authority who did the test? If it was swept under the carpet you wouldn't know about it.
The only thing the term "B Sample" confirms to me is... "This guy is a troll or a casual".
Which one are you?
Regarding gloves, Rivas' team said something. Whyte's team said something else. Choosing which one you believe doesn't make it a "fact". Rivas team confirmed they protested but 'reluctantly' approved the gloves in the end. Then complained about everything after their fighter lost. They are facts.
You need some education on what a fact is.Comment
-
You are ***ing clueless to be honest acting like the b sample isnt a thing that says it all. There's no point arguing with a tard. Pointless exercise go and fondle some more koala's you eucalyptus eating stiff idiot of a man.Keep waiting for the B Sample then. Not sure who told you anything is happening with it. Swept under the carpet... by being called to a hearing with the Authority who did the test? If it was swept under the carpet you wouldn't know about it.
The only thing the term "B Sample" confirms to me is... "This guy is a troll or a casual".
Which one are you?
Regarding gloves, Rivas' team said something. Whyte's team said something else. Choosing which one you believe doesn't make it a "fact". Rivas team confirmed they protested but 'reluctantly' approved the gloves in the end. Then complained about everything after their fighter lost. They are facts.
You need some education on what a fact is.Comment
-
So you think that what will happen is someone tests the B sample and says "Wow, he was guilty all along. We should have opened this sooner!".
Well done for cracking the case Columbo.
Or maybe the hearing that took place before the fight (and is possibly ongoing) is a little more complex than your completely uninformed view of the situation.Comment
-
Listen joey unless your in whytes team you are just as "uninformed" dont give me that bollocks you mouth breather.So you think that what will happen is someone tests the B sample and says "Wow, he was guilty all along. We should have opened this sooner!".
Well done for cracking the case Columbo.
Or maybe the hearing that took place before the fight (and is possibly ongoing) is a little more complex than your completely uninformed view of the situation.
"Subsequently, news of Whyte’s flagged test result managed to leak out to the press through multiple unknown sources with direct knowledge to the situation according to Hauser’s original report with a short list of potential suspects who could have been privileged to that information. The B sample results, which would either confirm or bring into question the results of the original A sample are being withheld, leaving many to question the motives behind the lack of transparency, perhaps even striking at the very integrity of the governing bodies themselves.
Whyte was allowed to compete despite a flagged test result for performance enhancing drugs by government bodies whose responsibility it is to protect the health and safety of its athletes. With boxers Maxim Dadashev and Hugo Santillan recently dying within a week of each other as a result of injuries sustained in the ring, the fact UKAD and BBBofC allowed this fight to commence without informing the Rivas camp prior to the fight is an unconscionable decision that is now under intense scrutiny. And the subsequent refusal to release Whyte’s B sample is only adding fuel to the fire in what may very well prove to be 2019’s most scandalous report in professional boxing."Last edited by Gideon lock; 11-13-2019, 10:48 AM.Comment
-
Not banned is not banned...don't see the issue.
Pov fought Johan on PEDs, there's no question about it. He didn't defend himself with no I didn't he defended himself with timing of the ban for the substance. He was on PEDs and was allowed to fight because he was not banned.
Whyte's still just speculation.Comment
-
Finally a bit of sense out of you (followed by a long copy paste from someone else's opinion presented as facts).
Yes, we are both uninformed. The difference here is that you assume that your lack of knowledge confirms your conspiracy theories, while I accept that we don't know what's happened and can only consider the few facts available to us.Comment
Comment