Comments Thread For: WBC Prez: We've Had Canelo as P4P #1 Since He Beat Golovkin
Collapse
-
-
Comment
-
-
Comment
-
The North American boxing establishment and the corrupt Central American WBC and WBA are the only ones that have Canelo P4P #1. Aficionado's have Lomachenko as the P4P #1 and they are and always have been the only ones that pay boxing's bills.Comment
-
-
The Ring agree... not only is Canelo a GREAT fighter... and not only is he the #1 P4P fighter on the planet... he is also fighter of the decade...
CANELO ALVAREZ: CONTEMPLATING GREATNESS
https://www.ring tv.com/582860-canel...ing-greatness/Comment
-
The Transnational Boxing Rankings Board has Canelo P4P #1, actually.
As does the unbiased Boxrec computer.Comment
-
well I personally take controversial wins/draws into consideration as I do ped use. But aside from that, p4p is really supposed to be, if size wasn't a factor, who would be the best. Now if Canelo did have a size and weight advantage over Crawford and Loma,Canelo entire career is not the two Golovkin fights. He beat Trout, Lara, and Smith winning 3 belts at 154, beat Cotto for lineal title at 160.
Then on top of that got a draw vs Golovkin when everybody on the damn planet expected him to get KNOCKED OUT. Then ran it right back for a rematch, and fought aggressively and got the win.
I’m not saying his best wins were not close wins. I’m not saying that all of his fights were absolute clear decisions where universally everyone felt that he won. Yes he’s had close fights that could go either way, but he’s won them and his resume is the best in the sport. He’s P4P #1 with grade A clenbuterol Mexican beef. Especially now that he’s added 175 belt to become 3 weight champ. If you stack up names and HOF opponents it ain’t close.
You think he'd beat them?Comment
-

Comment