but they never win against a slick black boxer.
Mexicans always beating the “boogeymen”
Collapse
-
-
-
It's only when I hear or read Golovkin's name, the first thing that comes to mind is the 2nd Canelo fight, seeing the bully get bullied... To me Golovkin is now a synonym for emasculated.Comment
-
-
I suspect that says more about you than it does about GGG, man.
You ever heard the saying 'the thief is always the first to accuse others of theft'? It's actually quite a shrewd observation on human psycholgy. Perhaps a pertinent one here.Comment
-
Tons of people think he got his face rearranged that night, plus the fact that Canelo has denied him the trilogy. The humiliation continues. I'm just calling it like I see it, there is no need to venture into psychoanalysis
Comment
-
Mexican fanboys are really becoming the worst fanbase in the sport.
How did a nation that has given us so many proud, fearless warriors produce so many sensitive phaggot fanboys is beyond me.
Guess they're a byproduct, like gelatin. Their hair are probably as colorful as gelatin is too. They're so as fruity.
Mexican fanboys, the gelatin of boxing.Comment
-
It's a strange phenomenum for sure. Most people saw a very close fight whichever way they scored it, certainly we've seen far more one sided fights and far worse injuries on fighters - almost every week in fact - yet more often than not the loser is praised for his gritty performance or whatever rather than being subject to epithets like emasculation or humiliation. I'm genuinely curious what makes people think that way, cos I just saw two professional fighters doing their job.
Maybe some folk were just more emotionally invested in this fight than others for some reason. That's kinda what I'm getting at though - what makes one dude just see a regular close fight and another dude see an 'emasculation'?
Last edited by Citizen Koba; 11-08-2019, 08:39 AM.Comment
Comment