pac beat floyd. he landed the much better punches. pac also won fighter of the decade 5 years before they fought but once again you dont care about any of that. it just sounds good. canelo was clearly drained and maybe that wouldnt be such a big deal if not for the floyd fans making such a big deal of it when pac did it to cotto. big difference being pac was a 140 champ and cotto a 147 champ while both floyd and canelo were champs at 154 and yet still fought at 152. embarassing. sure if you ignore all that it sounds like a great achievement.
Can you imagine that Floyd will now have beaten 2 FOTD?
Collapse
-
LOL dumbass. Since when is 23 "way before a fighters prime?" You do know that Tyson, De La Hoya, Ali, and Sugar ray Leonard were all considered prime at 23? The same age Canelo was when he got schooled by Floyd.
And Pacquiao is still winning championship fights years after losing to Floyd. So he couldn't have been over the hill when Floyd beat him.
Lmao you are a true dum@$$
Every sports analyst knows age isn’t always the main deciding factor in an athletes prime.
You must be a casual.
Did you start watching boxing after the Canelo GGG series?
Lmao buffoon.
Serafim already whooped Floyd’s arse.
NOT TBE
NOT UNDEFEATED.
Serafim is the GOAT.Comment
-
Unfortunately for you snowflake, I dont need your permission to use any types of expressions, metaphors or hyperbole.No. You do not have permission to re-define the expression. I just rewatched Mosley v Margarito last night. That was an ass whipping that you may wish to view for reference.
Floyd Mayweather outpointed a FOTD in unspectacular fashion is about the best that I can concede.
Floyd gave manny an ass whipping of a lifetime.Comment
-
Well, see? I tried to help you out, but then you stubbornly pressed forward anyway, and now you come across as someone as ****** and insane as your avi picture. You have my permission to keep being you.Comment
-
Your post is entirely reasonable apart from that first comment. Pac was terrible against Floyd.pac beat floyd. he landed the much better punches. pac also won fighter of the decade 5 years before they fought but once again you dont care about any of that. it just sounds good. canelo was clearly drained and maybe that wouldnt be such a big deal if not for the floyd fans making such a big deal of it when pac did it to cotto. big difference being pac was a 140 champ and cotto a 147 champ while both floyd and canelo were champs at 154 and yet still fought at 152. embarassing. sure if you ignore all that it sounds like a great achievement.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Most sports analysts aren't athletes. Many have never even played a sport professionally. So I wouldn't take their opinions too seriously. Age is a great determinant of a fighter's prime. For example no athlete at 40 is considered prime no matter how fit they may be for that age.Lmao you are a true dum@$$
Every sports analyst knows age isn’t always the main deciding factor in an athletes prime.
You must be a casual.
Did you start watching boxing after the Canelo GGG series?
Lmao buffoon.
Serafim already whooped Floyd’s arse.
NOT TBE
NOT UNDEFEATED.
Serafim is the GOAT.
People only say Canelo wasn't prime as an excuse for why he lost to Floyd. Nothing else. Before the fight they said Floyd wouldn't fight him. Then once Floyd beat him they said he was "too young."Comment
Comment