I'm just wondering what your logic is here. If Tyson has an atrocious boxing resume with his best win coming from a 12 year undefeated HW lineal/ring champion and Wilders most notable was Ortiz, why is Wilder a first ballet and Fury will be doubtful to even receive a nomination? It's perhaps also worth noting that when the 2 guys fought, fury won more rounds than wilder did.
I ask this purely out of curiosity, i'm not a huge fan of either.
I ask this purely out of curiosity, i'm not a huge fan of either.





Comment