Your P4P Top 5

[M Bison]

Lomachenko
Spence
Usyk
Crawford
Golovkin

In that order

[M Bison]

Now, I can understand if some would include Lomachenko in their top 5, even if I dont' agree.

But Usyk? He dominated cruiserweight, yeah, but that was an absolutely horrible division, possibly weaker than the current super middleweight division. And as for Golovkin, his best wins are probably Martin Murray and Kell Brook, if you take into account that he got gift decisions against Jacobs and Derevyachenko. Golovkin spent his entire career hiding at 160 lb, refusing to move up, while fighting trash opponents 90% of the time and not doing well when fighting above-average opponents. Golovkin is a coward.

Ydksab... Delete your account right now you absolute mongrel.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

1: Canelo
2: Derevyachenko
3: Golovkin
4: Quillin

That's a pretty good top 4, IMO.

He lost to both Canelo and Golovkin.

So his best official win is against a guy who was 12-0 and has never won a world title.

Quit trolling kid...

[ShawnTaylor]

He lost to both Canelo and Golovkin.

So his best official win is against a guy who was 12-0 and has never won a world title.

Quit trolling kid...

You soon gotta make up your mind. You think that Golovkin beat Canelo twice, despite the official results. Yet when it comes to Jacobs, you suddenly think the official results should be taken much more seriously? You can call me a troll if that somehow boosts your weird nerdy self-esteem, but at the end of the day, we both know you're just a whiny racist who got bullied by black kids at school. Man up, the shid you're pulling right now is just pathetic.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

You soon gotta make up your mind. You think that Golovkin beat Canelo twice, despite the official results. Yet when it comes to Jacobs, you suddenly think the official results should be taken much more seriously? You can call me a troll if that somehow boosts your weird nerdy self-esteem, but at the end of the day, we both know you're just a whiny racist who got bullied by black kids at school. Man up, the shid you're pulling right now is just pathetic.

I’m mixed race you fool...

You’re just a race baiting little troll with no social life that exists beyond your keyboard.

Weak ass...

[ShawnTaylor]

I’m mixed race you fool...

Half German, half Swedish?

[boliodogs]

Who do you consider to be the P4P top 5 at the moment and why? I see it like this...

1: Crawford. He is such a balanced fighter and he has not just beaten, but dominated, lots of good fighters through the years.
2: Wilder. His KO percentage is absolutely insane and he has defeated opponents such as Stiverne, Fury and Ortiz, who all have proven themselves as quality opposition. Not as balanced as Crawford, but his pure destructiveness makes him a clear number two, IMO.
3: Rigondeaux. He defeated a P4P top fighter in Donaire and his only loss came against a way bigger Lomachenko, who himself is a good boxer. He is a better boxer than Wilder, but I have him below him, as he is starting to get old.
4: Jacobs. He got robbed against Golovkin and Canelo. If the judges had been less influenced by the popularity of his opponents, Jacobs would have one of the best resumes in the entire sport at the moment. He lost to Pirog, fair and square, but that feels like ages ago and he has improved a lot since then.
5: Joshua. He was the big champ at heavyweight until his loss to Ruiz and I expect him to avenge the loss in the rematch. The loss was pretty bad, though, so I have him down at number 5 at the moment.

To me your top 5 is one of the worst I have ever seen anyone post and brag about. No heavyweight belongs in the top 10 today and Wilder should have lost to Fury although I think he will win the rematch. Jacobs is a good fighter and maybe a top 15 but he is a notch below the best. He sure as hell did NOT get robbed by GGG or Canelo. They both took the fight to him and had him retreating. They both outlanded him and won more rounds and the decisions were both UD.s against him. You are clearly a big Jacobs fan but he lost close fights to both GGG and Canelo and almost everybody but a few die hard Jacobs fans or GGG haters know Jacobs lost and deserved to lose. The GGG fight was in Jacobs's home state. Crawford does belong on a top 10 best list but he is the only fighter on your list that belongs. Rigo was totally outclassed by Loma who should be on your list but isn't. Rigo quit in the corner for no good reason. AJ just got KOed and you have him top 5. Un***ingbelievable. You must be an Englishman.

[boliodogs]

You soon gotta make up your mind. You think that Golovkin beat Canelo twice, despite the official results. Yet when it comes to Jacobs, you suddenly think the official results should be taken much more seriously? You can call me a troll if that somehow boosts your weird nerdy self-esteem, but at the end of the day, we both know you're just a whiny racist who got bullied by black kids at school. Man up, the shid you're pulling right now is just pathetic.

He is absolutely right and you are ******. Nobody in their right mind goes by what the judges say 100 percent because they are wrong so often and crooked, bias or paid off so often. The majority have always thought GGG beat Canelo twice but on this boxing board Canelo is very popular and GGG is not. This boxing site is not an accurate picture of how things are in the real world. The big majority agree that Jacobs fought well but clearly lost close fights to both GGG and Canelo. The judges got it right in those fights. Oscar owns those Vegas judges and they made sure he took no loss from GGG and made sure he won the rematch. They won't let him lose to Kovalev either.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Half German, half Swedish?

Typical troll response...

I’m English born but meu avo era Brasileiro.

You need to get over your inferiority complex... all races are equal.

[Lomasexual]

Ydksab... Delete your account right now you absolute mongrel.

It is an alt account.

Someone who obviously kept making ****** threads and ****** comments, and who had zero credibility and a bad reputation as a result, decided to create an alt.

Because they want to go through to process of people discovering what an asshole and shitty poster they are a second time.

I've known some people who made new alts to get away from the poor reputation of their old username, to start new, and because they legitimately wanted to begin again as better posters.

The OP here is just a cunt who wants to double down on the kind of ****** cuntness which made everyone realise they were a cunt in the first place.