Can we all stop a second and see that two judges gave Golovkin 7 rounds?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • _Maxi
    Undisputed Champion
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2015
    • 8978
    • 509
    • 718
    • 91,740

    #1

    Can we all stop a second and see that two judges gave Golovkin 7 rounds?

    When most people saw Derevyanchenko win.

    When I read most people can defend a 6-6 victory for GGG, at most.

    How could two judges give Golovkin not 6, but 7 rounds?

    Just make me understand how this was not a robbery.

  • Ray*
    Be safe!!!
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2005
    • 44867
    • 1,654
    • 1,608
    • 558,890

    #2
    GGG definitely didn't win rounds 7 - 10 on my card or any card for that matter.

    Comment

    • The Big Dunn
      Undisputed Champion
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Sep 2009
      • 70615
      • 10,133
      • 8,319
      • 287,568

      #3
      It was a close fight. Robbery is when one guy clearly wins and the judge gives it to the other guy or there is a draw. Sweet Pea/Chavez was a robbery. This was a close, tough fight where judges gave some rounds to the bigger name where NSB posters gave it to the lesser name.

      If you notice, in every close, tough fight scored by NSB posters, there is a group of posters that always claims the lesser name got robbed.

      Comment

      • KTFOKING
        Undisputed Champion
        Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
        • Jun 2018
        • 14399
        • 1,266
        • 284
        • 344,781

        #4
        It wasn't a robbery at all. Scoring it live, thought it was hard to give GGG 7 rounds. But I bet if we all post our scorecards, you will see at least 7-8 different rounds he was given. Now, you will probably see even more rounds given to Derevyanchenko.

        Either way, not a robbery.

        Comment

        • ThomasJK
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • May 2015
          • 724
          • 14
          • 45
          • 11,387

          #5
          Not as close as it appeared after rewatching the fight a few times yesterday afternoon. Dev showed alot of heart and courage, but i saw alot of flurries with more misses than hits. High punch output doesn't automatically mean that boxers gets the nod. Dev did land some serious punches on GGG, but Golovkin landed the more telling punches and the judges saw that too. Hats off to Dev for a great and exciting fight, but the right man won the decision.

          Comment

          • 4truth
            U can't handle the Truth
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Feb 2016
            • 15281
            • 4,153
            • 1,672
            • 197,686

            #6
            So many close rounds that 7 rounds to either fighter would not be hard to understand.

            Comment

            • KillaCamNZ
              Undisputed Champion
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Feb 2016
              • 3967
              • 200
              • 156
              • 29,082

              #7
              You can understand it's not a robbery by going back to basics and understanding what a robbery in boxing actually is.

              Comment

              • Mammoth
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Sep 2016
                • 35717
                • 3,848
                • 3,389
                • 378,304

                #8
                No way G won 7 rounds.

                Comment

                • Boxing Goat
                  The G.O.A.T.
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Aug 2013
                  • 13150
                  • 557
                  • 1,027
                  • 128,865

                  #9
                  Originally posted by _Maxi
                  When most people saw Derevyanchenko win.

                  When I read most people can defend a 6-6 victory for GGG, at most.

                  How could two judges give Golovkin not 6, but 7 rounds?

                  Just make me understand how this was not a robbery.

                  So, to you, a single round swing difference is a robbery?

                  You are either just too disgruntled to understand what a robbery really is or just don't know how to score a boxing match. Frenetic movement doesn't automatically win a boxing match. SD fought very very well considering that he was cut badly for most of the fight but he came away getting dropped, got hit more, got hit with the stronger punches and was badly cut with a clean punch. GGG was tested but no way he lost more than 6 rds, making him the correct winner. Def not a robbery.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  TOP