Give me a FK'n break! GGG won clearly

[Gideon lock]

Who the phuck are you? You’re a ******** noob that probably came here illegally from Kawktarzan. Phuck out of my website.

Who the *** are you. Learn a thing called Reading comprehension the bloke stated he had an account previously and set up this new one after the old was locked for whatever reason. Its not your site either it's CBS'S. ****** cowboy of a man. Go lasso your neck and stfu.

[aboutfkntime]

''Clearly''....

The little guy (a white version of stevens) bullied GGG all night while using one hand. He used one hand to wipe away the blood and the other to beat on GGG with.

A flash knock down once again saved his ass. And even in that round, GGG wasn't dominant.

[aboutfkntime]

are you g-strings totally forgetting that was an actual fight... and concentrating on furiously counting pitty-pat jabs again... like you all did after the Canelo rematch?

[Gate_Keeper]

are you g-strings totally forgetting that was an actual fight... and concentrating on furiously counting pitty-pat jabs again... like you all did after the Canelo rematch?

Wrong, jabs add up in terms of damage, as we saw with Jacobs and Lemueix. Sure, one jab doesn't mean much but it will win you the round if all the other guy did was punch your shoulders and arms all round. When you combine the power punches and jabs for both fighters and ignore the ineffective aggressive mostly from SD and his pitty patt shots when clenching, GGG won most of the rounds pretty convincingly. Only two rounds close for me were 2 and 9 and that's because there was almost equal damage done. I ignored agression from both.

[aboutfkntime]

Wrong, jabs add up in terms of damage, as we saw with Jacobs and Lemueix. Sure, one jab doesn't mean much but it will win you the round if all the other guy did was punch your shoulders and arms all round. When you combine the power punches and jabs for both fighters and ignore the ineffective aggressive mostly from SD and his pitty patt shots when clenching, GGG won most of the rounds pretty convincingly. Only two rounds close for me were 2 and 9 and that's because there was almost equal damage done. I ignored agression from both.

so you guys ARE concentrating on furiously counting pitty-pat jabs again... like you all did after the Canelo rematch LMAO

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* defence
* ring generalship

the judges are not even gonna look at some of that shlt you are tallying up bro

[Gate_Keeper]

so you guys ARE concentrating on furiously counting pitty-pat jabs again... like you all did after the Canelo rematch LMAO

* clean hard punching
* effective aggression
* defence
* ring generalship

the judges are not even gonna look at some of that shlt you are tallying up bro

Not pitty pat jabs but actually jabs. 5 clean jabs to the face for example, does more damage than a flush power shot. So it depends, if there are a lot of jabs from one guy and a few power shots from the other, you must always task yourself with deciding who did more damage. You cannot simply give the round to the power shot guy because one power shot does more damage than one jab. That was the case with GGG vs Jacobs. GGG landed jabs all night and a few power shots. Canelo i thought won the rematch by one round, round 12 specifically. But SD was getting jabbed and hit with power shots in about half the fight and not landing much outside of the rounds he won.

And to be fair my scoring system is different but i think each judge is a bit different in how they score. I have never cared about ring generalship for example. All that matters to me is who appears to have landed to better shots taking in to account both quantity and quality. Those other things only matter they both did equal damage, which is rare.

[aboutfkntime]

Not pitty pat jabs but actually jabs. 5 clean jabs to the face for example, does more damage than a flush power shot. So it depends, if there are a lot of jabs from one guy and a few power shots from the other, you must always task yourself with deciding who did more damage. You cannot simply give the round to the power shot guy because one power shot does more damage than one jab. That was the case with GGG vs Jacobs. GGG landed jabs all night and a few power shots. Canelo i thought won the rematch by one round, round 12 specifically. But SD was getting jabbed and hit with power shots in about half the fight and not landing much outside of the rounds he won.

And to be fair my scoring system is different but i think each judge is a bit different in how they score. I have never cared about ring generalship for example. All that matters to me is who appears to have landed to better shots taking in to account both quantity and quality. Those other things only matter they both did equal damage, which is rare.

then, your scorecard is irrelevant

* clean HARD punching

[Gate_Keeper]

then, your scorecard is irrelevant

Wrong, because, as i said, judges tend to score differently. There's no section on their scorecard for ring generalship agression and things like that. So it's very subjective and they don't particularly have to defend their scores either so at least you can hear why they gave the score they gave. But for the most part, their scores are generally consistent with mine as they were in the Jacobs fight and this fight.

[VatoMulatto]

I thought GGG edged it but it was very very close. Definitely not a "clear" win. One of those fights that could've gone either way. The moment the fight was over I thought the judges would score it a draw.

[aboutfkntime]

Wrong, because, as i said, judges tend to score differently. There's no section on their scorecard for ring generalship agression and things like that. So it's very subjective and they don't particularly have to defend their scores either so at least you can hear why they gave the score they gave. But for the most part, their scores are generally consistent with mine as they were in the Jacobs fight and this fight.

wtf ?

of course there is... they do not sit there counting jabs on their fingers, they evaluate the round based on the 4 official criteria and score accordingly

sometimes they watch one fighter more than the other, what can I say

* clean HARD punching

which is why compubox is totally irrelevant

the judges use a professional scoring system, and they only value/score effective punches... compubox is just a tally of activity that is often inaccurate

activity is not official scoring criteria

after the Golovkin/Canelo rematch:
" but, all of the fans think... "

after the Golovkin/Derevy fight:
" fcuk the fans, the judges think... "

it all sounds a bit convenient

the fighters know... there is a reason why Golovkin said it was Sergiys night, not his night