I still think GGG's win over Jacobs was more controversial

[Mammoth]

Sorry but this fight had legit swings where the Jacobs fight didn't. I'm not mad GGG got the nod, the UD was wrong though.

[lizard_man]

GGG jacobs was a close but clear win for GGG.

[Jewish-Reptile]

Two fights that nobody can argue could have gone either way the only real way to split them truly is rematches and frankly the way GG is looking of late he’s best served not rewatching of the the close fights he narrowly got by in, guys like Jacobs, Canelo and Sergiy have much more in their reserves energy wise than he has, like it or not he’s on the slide a certain decline he’s still amongst the top of the division but I don’t consider him elite any longer like I used to.

The blueprint is there now to beat him, Jacobs, Canelo and Sergiy have all had success by studying his fights against those who’ve fallen to him earlier in his career. Lomachenko is the boogeyman now where their really isn’t a blueprint yet I don’t really consider his solitary loss a loss on reviewing.

[DuckAdonis]

Scored both fights 114-113

Derevyanchenko did way better offensively than Jacobs did tho

[4truth]

Only in your own mind. Golovkin over Jacobs was about as controversial as Jacobs over D-chenko, which is to say not at all.

[rickJen]

Nah, when I was watching it live I also thought Jacobs won.
When I saw it the second time, it was clear there were rounds
that Jacobs didn't win, which I thought he did the first time.
Interestingly, I saw Carl Froch on youtube and got the same initial impression.
GGG beat Jacobs by razor thin margin, imo.
We gotta move on doe.

[_Rexy_]

I thought G/Jacobs was a lot like Canelo/Jacobs

Close on my cards, but the rounds weren’t close.

I thought G beat Jacobs clear by 1 point. Canelo beat Jacobs clear by one point.

Last night had MANY rounds that could have gone either way.