Comments Thread For: Spence: If I Can't Get Pacquiao We'll Fight Danny Garcia

[patron]

Strap season is over. Duck season is in.

[Sledgeweather17]

Do you think Spence vs Crawford and the winner face Manny for unification is good for the sport? Manny already said he only wants two fight before he retires. Should a 41 year old Manny fight both killers to unify if Spence refuses to do the same?

Spence is not refusing. He is acknowledging that he and Crawford aren't big enough names yet to hold down a joint ppv. The networks aint gonna be interested in co-operation if the business doesn't make sense.

That's why he is so desperate for the PAC fight, because then he will be big enough for the networks to hold the joint ppv, assuming he beats Pac of course.

Another fact yawl pretending doesn't exist is the fact that no PBC fighter, in ANY weight class, is holding the WBO belt.

The last time a PBC fighter held it was Floyd Mayweather at beating pac, and he got stripped two months later.

What's the point of beating Crawford now, and then getting stripped before you can even fight Manny to become the undisputed champ?

PS. Funny how all the PAC fans saying Pac easily beats Spence coz Porter did this and that, yet the same fans are moving the goal posts when people are talking Spence vs Pac.

[Fire4231]

Great fight, tell you what Danny may be a bad style match up for Spence.

Like Errol but he tends to want to show his competition that he can beat them at their own game. Danny landing that pull counter clean is a problem.

All time greats like Mayweather would grab the win by diffusing what the opponent does well. The former is placing Spence in harms way. This is at a time when he has the tool kit to not take prime reducing punishment.

However Spence is “not,” ducking Crawford despite what the anti-PBC would claim.

The bigger question is why is the best fighter in the world P4P fighting no name challenges? Their are great Welters who want the WBO belt. Why does Terrence get to fight the unproven waiting on Errol?

[Rip Chudd]

I don't really think Pac is interested in fighting Spence (I hope I'm wrong). Why wouldn't the next fight be Crawford then? This fool said he wanted to be undisputed. Another Garcia fight (different garcia doe) is not what fans are clamoring for. I'll wait to see what happens, but if it isn't Pac or Crawford next then Spence should be the object of ridicule. I'm basing that all on him saying he wants to unify all titles. Danny brings nothing to the table except another paycheck

[wrecksracer]

given the problems Spence had with a pressure fighter with no accuracy (Porter), I don't see a fight with Pac as being an easy win for him. The pressure from Porter was giving Spence fits. Pac applies that same pressure plus accuracy.

[hectari]

Just fight crawford already, pacman is fighting mikey garcia for a big retirement fight in the philippines.

[Jab jab boom]

yeah the Spence is the boogey man fans. That is who . They actually think this dude is special. This guy is very technical has great size for the weight, yet his feet are like he is tuck in quicksand. Its funny how any time a brutha fights he automatically is albeled a slick boxer. Spence isnt slick in anyway. That is why it think Pac beats him. He is very hittable and he has average punching speed at best. Poret was marking him up with those wide arm punches and elbows.

I am not a spence fan nor do I believe that he's the boogeyman. But I am a boxing fan who knows the sport and knows that he'd beat the hell out of pac. Porter at this point would also beat pac and Crawford certainly will as well. You seem to have forgotten how easy it was for horn and Thurman to put hands on pac. Pac won't be able to take that kind of punishment from spence. I'm not sure where you're getting this perception that people say spence is slick because he's black. That actually sounds like a racist comment from you. Spence wins because he's bigger, stronger, is a sharp puncher who goes to the body very well. Pac will be in for hell if they dare to take the fight. You better hope they don't, since it seems that pac getting crushed may hurt your soul beyond repair.

[Ake-Dawg]

Do you think Spence vs Crawford and the winner face Manny for unification is good for the sport? Manny already said he only wants two fight before he retires. Should a 41 year old Manny fight both killers to unify if Spence refuses to do the same?

By the time Spence Crawford fight and rematch take place how old will Manny be?

[jackblack008]

Cool down folks. I have suggestion you all would agree. Make Broner vs Spence..

[Sledgeweather17]

Great fight, tell you what Danny may be a bad style match up for Spence.

Like Errol but he tends to want to show his competition that he can beat them at their own game. Danny landing that pull counter clean is a problem.

All time greats like Mayweather would grab the win by diffusing what the opponent does well. The former is placing Spence in harms way. This is at a time when he has the tool kit to not take prime reducing punishment.

However Spence is “not,” ducking Crawford despite what the anti-PBC would claim.

The bigger question is why is the best fighter in the world P4P fighting no name challenges? Their are great Welters who want the WBO belt. Why does Terrence get to fight the unproven waiting on Errol?

There are no great welters, in fact there are no PBC fighters in any weight class who want the wbo belt.

Google the PBC/Austin Trout legal dispute vs the WBO. Ever since then no PBC fighter (besides Floyd unification with PAC, who got stripped two months after winning it) have fought for the wbo.