What if Spence fought the Brook that Porter fought?

[Robbie Barrett]

He was behind on all 3 cards after 10 and then quit. That’s what’s relevant not being “ahead after 7”.😂

So you didn’t go to this fight...

Do you go to many fights?

He was ahead until he was headbutted which caused an injury, which stopped him. An injury caused by a foul/illegal shot should stop the fight and it goes to the cards. If that happened Brook would have won because he was ahead on the cards.

You supposed to be a boxing fan but don't know the rules?

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

He was ahead until he was headbutted which caused an injury, which stopped him. An injury caused by a foul/illegal shot should stop the fight and it goes to the cards. If that happened Brook would have won because he was ahead on the cards.

You supposed to be a boxing fan but don't know the rules?

He quit, he lost, get over it...

Do you go to many fights?
You seem scared to answer this question, why?

[Robbie Barrett]

He quit, he lost, get over it...

Do you go to many fights?
You seem scared to answer this question, why?

He was fouled. He lost incorrectly. You don't know the rules of the sport you follow. Your question is irrelevant to the discussion. It's a deflection, tactics used by posters that are losing an argument.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

He was ahead until he was headbutted which caused an injury, which stopped him. An injury caused by a foul/illegal shot should stop the fight and it goes to the cards. If that happened Brook would have won because he was ahead on the cards.

You supposed to be a boxing fan but don't know the rules?

On the subject of the rules...

The head clash happened in round 8 right?

So round 8 would also be scored.

So Brook wouldn’t have been ahead as it was level after 8 ok one card with the other two split.

Not that it’s relevant cause he quit in the 11th. But it does prove you WRONG.

Who doesn’t know the rules???

That’s why you should attend shows little man, you might actually learn a few things about the sport.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

He was fouled. He lost incorrectly. You don't know the rules of the sport you follow. Your question is irrelevant to the discussion. It's a deflection, tactics used by posters that are losing an argument.

A foul is determined by the referee. The referee didn’t rule it a foul.

Wrong again...

Learn the rules buddy...

He lost, he quit, get over it.

If you attended shows maybe you’d know this...

[Robbie Barrett]

On the subject of the rules...

The head clash happened in round 8 right?

So round 8 would also be scored.

So Brook wouldn’t have been ahead as it was level after 8 ok one card with the other two split.

Not that it’s relevant cause he quit in the 11th. But it does prove you WRONG.

Who doesn’t know the rules???

That’s why you should attend shows little man, you might actually learn a few things about the sport.

Wrong again. A round is only scored when finished. The clash happened in round 8 so if it was stopped only the cards upto and including round 7 would count. As i said you don't know the rules of the sport you follow.

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Wrong again. A round is only scored when finished. The clash happened in round 8 so if it was stopped only the cards upto and including round 7 would count. As i said you don't know the rules of the sport you follow.

No it isn’t.

Go watch Allakhverdiev vs Guzman...

https://www.dailymotion.com/video/xvimpt

Wrong again hahahaha...

Have you ever been to a boxing show? Or too scared to answer.

Plastic fan watching from the couch...

[Vodkaholic]

Brook woulda win

[Dean_Razorback]

brook's stamina is shit

[boliodogs]

I think he would knock Brook out just like he did. It might have been closer but the ending would be the same in my opinion. Spence is a winner and he gets the job done every time. I thought the two judges that gave the fight to Spence 116 to 111 were correct and the judge that gave the fight to Porter robbed Spence. I just beat on Spence to beat any welterweight and he has so far.