He's rated by trainers, fighters, fans, and journalists as the best fighter in the
world. Your "who has he fought" means **** all in a world where his peers are afraid to fight him.
He rated by trainers, fighters, fans, and journalists as the best fighter in the
world.
Problem is they are raiting him off of potential not actual fighters he has defeated. Therein lies the problem with boxing. Potential is just that POTENTIAL. Actual wins is the only thing that should matter.
Who has Crawford actually defeated that make him the best at 147?
He is living off of accomplishments at 135 and 140 not at 147.
Beating Horn means squat when Horns claim to fame is a universal acknowledged robbery of Pacquiao.
Benavidez? Who is that?
Amir Khan is over the hill and pretty much shot at this point.
Crawford has done nothing significant at 147 to be the top WW. Hell Pacquiao's win over Thurman is better then anything Crawford has.
Signed with Top Rank! So the Spence haters(fake Crawford fans) can use that as an excuse.
Spence is now a unified champion while bud will be fighting The Meme Machine.
Crawford is far more deserving at a shot at Spence than Mikey Garcia or Danny Garcia.
Porter and Danny Garcia fought for a vacant belt that Thurman gave up because of inactivity. Thurman already beat both of them, and now Thurman was dropped and beat by a 40 year old Pacquiao.
Crawford beat Horn worse than Pacquiao, and now has Pacquiao's old belt, he was undisputed at 140, and has the P4P crown.
In 2019, Thurman fought Josesito Lopez, Pacquiao fought Broner, and Danny Garcia fought Adrian Granados.
Since Pacquiao and Spence aren't fighting each other next, they can't say there are more deserving opponents out there than the other champion, Crawford.
Comment