were the 116-111 scorecards fair?

[The Problem]

Where the score cards pre filled or something what the ****.

114-113 Spence would have been fine.

[4truth]

So many close rounds. I had to laugh when they showed Macklin’s card giving the first 3 round to Spence, when I had given the first 3 to Porter. He scored the next 3 for Porter while I gave 2 of those 3 to Spence. It was a tough fight to score.

[MehdiQaos]

Its a joke

[x23shots]

I scored it 116-111 for Errol as well

RD1: PORTER
RD2: SPENCE
RD3: SPENCE
RD4: PORTER
RD5: SPENCE
RD6: SPENCE
RD7: PORTER
RD8: SPENCE
RD9: PORTER
RD10: SPENCE
RD11: SPENCE (10-8)
RD12: SPENCE

[_Rexy_]

there were a lot of close rounds. I had it 114-113 Porter, but I'm not mad at the result.

[deanrw]

All I know is that so called judges cannot score. Two 5 point wins for Spence and a 3 point win for Porter were all crap. It was a very close fight that could have been a draw if not for the knockdown.

[MulaKO]

All I know is that so called judges cannot score. Two 5 point wins for Spence and a 3 point win for Porter were all crap. It was a very close fight that could have been a draw if not for the knockdown.

Your absolutely right
That was my thinking also
I didn’t see it as a draw , I haughty Spence pulled it off in the very end

[Blond Beast]

there were a lot of close rounds. I had it 114-113 Porter, but I'm not mad at the result.

After the knockdown my brother texted me “If u didn’t know who was winning you do now...”
I had Spence by 2-3 points, and I was cheering for Porter. But part of me knew most judges would score close rounds for Spence. Porters style doesn’t usually get any rub with judges. 116-111 is way too wide but it’s not surprising.

[Robbie Barrett]

How can they have Porter winning only 4 rounds? It's just not possible if you are scoring fairly.

[Phenom]

I had it 7-5 so that's one round the other way