Shawn robbed!!

[buddyr]

I thought Spence should have been penalized or had a point or two deducted for repeated low blows. He landed a lot of blows below the belt line. Those **** punches hurt and the irony of it is that he calls Porter a dirty fighter.

not to defend Spence's actions, but Porter actually hit him low first and he was retaliating. If Lomachenko had did that against Salido, he probably would have won their fight. That's old school. If someone hits you low, don't complain to the ref, hit him back. Both of them were hitting low all night

[champion4ever]

not to defend Spence's actions, but Porter actually hit him low first and he was retaliating. If Lomachenko had did that against Salido, he probably would have won their fight. That's old school. If someone hits you low, don't complain to the ref, hit him back. Both of them were hitting low all night

I get all that! That was Spence strategy all along. To wear Porter down to the body in order to KO him. Kill the body then the head would follow.

However, throughout the fight Spence subsequently and repeatedly landed several more low blows that the referee didn't even warn him about. Also, he kept leaning on the back of Shawn Porter's neck too.

In any case, knockdown or no Spence did not win this fight. He lost. Porter was the rightful winner of this fight.

Most boxing fans believed that Porter either won the fight or at best it was a draw.

[HeadBodyBodyBody]

Do we agree that Porter clearly lost the last 3 rounds? (I hope we do). Including the knockdown in the 11th(2 point round). The ABSOLUTE ONLY WAY this would be a robbery is if anyone had porter up 8-1 or 7-2 going into the 10th. Even if you had it 6-3 in favor of Porter going into the 10th, that's a 1 point victory for Spence with the knockdown. We can debate rounds 1-9, but 10-12 were Spence's. And I need for someone to explain how they had a 8-1 or 7-2 card for either fighter going into the 10th.

Agreed, Spence closed out the show and won the last three rounds emphatically, and this fact alone makes it difficult to give the fight to Porter.

All three judges gave the last three to Spence EXCEPT the judge who scored the fight to Porter (he gave the 10th to Porter, and 11 and 12 to Spence), but that judge also gave Porter the first four rounds, which is amazing to me, especially the third round. In fact, if you look at the official scorecards, that judge has initially written in '10' for Spence in the third, but then crossed it out!

[Code Red]

Wow is it really this many of you who still don't know how to score or even watch a fight?

[R_Walken]

No Porter wasn’t robbed he was competitive for the first 2/3 of the Fight then let the fight get away from him and he got KD

No Robbery if anything the Judge That scores it for For Porter should be banned